From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6DA20EB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741045800; cv=none; b=DbbAAQe9wYQx3C2V8/AN4X2kaKxT5JqkcKnCfvFnGtFh9P93SvtmiipNhnZf85peTQSmLdjMCu6mf8FiP+WjGWUUlPf7q23KVu4zYKdZ08sS56ili/TGK78zZqb/VQpBT/eZeNuJQeRpxh6pSaKhoKJZ1HRFmd9GBfsHkh+YaPw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741045800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K3FhoAM4dvvrocFt48dCZynzxMocKl8lREc+96zHmfc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V1xQxxJ6nKmB9shlTAJ6LIguLkoWJdmr9jpepbIFeY0ez1LfmFZNP0YXZyo+f6E3jAFlIpXulVwiUFTznZ+0gS4tmO1YEBV1pNnuH7n30EtERUaiy1wf3IaIZ5P0qCT3Jsux7F5VxjF6RwjkA7DDfLA+1z+Q1ZjLiu2XKNqyhPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Pjz8meHM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Pjz8meHM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741045799; x=1772581799; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=K3FhoAM4dvvrocFt48dCZynzxMocKl8lREc+96zHmfc=; b=Pjz8meHMq1jr/Fs+QOa+McWoDaczv7q0QlBoy+9iyJE3SDQBFlHCTSvq tUoYZk3Q25oOXlpoeXr92z5fnHylYDLL35WP5cimNu0FXxrpGSqxYzwW4 z8K/0t2fFV8oRMIdPAM/DVABGvqvZ5kPXAQGq0j6yZewGMTYBKT0r2rws ymJ92XLv45h2nq2hWVQVXBlfjRWn7l2Rx/z0hTwnBYDLKjyf9ldp6uFYn Liilo3N8N+r1VH4Znv294/of+3IrC4VuZYccR/+elsn3QgrogIfIv/rSy OoO5FoCDFbrLKuJmL8ifmOnLZ9En0Q7QUkASEssVf21Yp2W7VOhoz6iIr w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jKJ1v7stSpiPjlM0YxuMCA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NVnV/C4aSLC8MpuJ2BEZ3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11362"; a="44753113" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,331,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="44753113" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2025 15:49:59 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YdKTn2byS8ymABZe5hCEjw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KSdTLPbiSiC9v+yVVIXetw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,331,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="123143615" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 76cde6cc1f07) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2025 15:49:56 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 76cde6cc1f07 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tpFXl-000J3C-0H; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 23:49:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 07:49:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: inwardvessel , tj@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, yosryahmed@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] cgroup: separate rstat locks for subsystems Message-ID: <202503040736.kEeH1wt6-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250227215543.49928-4-inwardvessel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250227215543.49928-4-inwardvessel@gmail.com> Hi inwardvessel, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/net] [also build test ERROR on bpf-next/master bpf/master linus/master v6.14-rc5] [cannot apply to tj-cgroup/for-next next-20250303] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/inwardvessel/cgroup-move-cgroup_rstat-from-cgroup-to-cgroup_subsys_state/20250228-055819 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git net patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227215543.49928-4-inwardvessel%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/4 v2] cgroup: separate rstat locks for subsystems config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250304/202503040736.kEeH1wt6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250304/202503040736.kEeH1wt6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503040736.kEeH1wt6-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/loongarch/include/asm/bug.h:61, from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/thread_info.h:13, from include/asm-generic/current.h:6, from ./arch/loongarch/include/generated/asm/current.h:1, from include/linux/sched.h:12, from include/linux/cgroup.h:12, from kernel/cgroup/cgroup-internal.h:5, from kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:2: kernel/cgroup/rstat.c: In function 'cgroup_rstat_flush_locked': >> include/linux/lockdep.h:252:61: error: 'lock' is a pointer; did you mean to use '->'? 252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:123:32: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON' 123 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \ | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:24: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_is_held' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:339:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 339 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +252 include/linux/lockdep.h f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20 251 f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30 @252 #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30 253 #define lockdep_is_held_type(lock, r) lock_is_held_type(&(lock)->dep_map, (r)) f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20 254 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki