Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] memcg: trylock stock for objcg
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:47:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250314114700.TiLB4FH0@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250314061511.1308152-10-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

On 2025-03-13 23:15:10 [-0700], Shakeel Butt wrote:
> To make objcg stock functions work without disabling irq, we need to
> convert those function to use localtry_trylock_irqsave() instead of
> localtry_lock_irqsave(). This patch for now just does the conversion and
> later patch will eliminate the irq disabling code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c803d2f5e322..ba5d004049d3 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2764,7 +2764,11 @@ static void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int *bytes;
>  
> -	localtry_lock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
> +	if (!localtry_trylock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags)) {

Don't you need to change the of memcg_stock.stock_lock? Didn't we
introduce an explicit different type for this trylock feature?

> +		__mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, idx, nr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>  
>  	/*

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-14 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14  6:15 [RFC PATCH 00/10] memcg: stock code cleanups Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] memcg: remove root memcg check from refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] memcg: decouple drain_obj_stock from local stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  9:57   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] memcg: introduce memcg_uncharge Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:01   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] memcg: manually inline __refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:05   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] memcg: no refilling stock from obj_cgroup_release Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:09   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 11:26   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 15:25     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] memcg: do obj_cgroup_put inside drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:17   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 11:35     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 15:29       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] memcg: use __mod_memcg_state in drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:27   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 11:44     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 11:38   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] memcg: assert in_task for couple of local_lock holders Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] memcg: trylock stock for objcg Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 11:47   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-03-14 15:33     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14  6:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] memcg: no more irq disabling for stock locks Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:54   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 11:58     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 15:55       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 16:42         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 17:02           ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 17:38             ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 18:19             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-14 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] memcg: stock code cleanups Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 16:03   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250314114700.TiLB4FH0@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox