cgroups.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
	nphamcs@gmail.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com,
	apais@linux.microsoft.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 08/28] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:45:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415024532.26632-9-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415024532.26632-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

In a subsequent patch, we'll reparent the LRU folios. The folios that are
moved to the appropriate LRU list can undergo reparenting during the
move_folios_to_lru() process. Hence, it's incorrect for the caller to hold
a lruvec lock. Instead, we should utilize the more general interface of
folio_lruvec_relock_irq() to obtain the correct lruvec lock.

This patch involves only code refactoring and doesn't introduce any
functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a76b3cee043d..eac5e6e70660 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1901,24 +1901,27 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
 /*
  * move_folios_to_lru() moves folios from private @list to appropriate LRU list.
  *
- * Returns the number of pages moved to the given lruvec.
+ * Returns the number of pages moved to the appropriate lruvec.
+ *
+ * Note: The caller must not hold any lruvec lock.
  */
-static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
-		struct list_head *list)
+static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct list_head *list)
 {
 	int nr_pages, nr_moved = 0;
+	struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
 	struct folio_batch free_folios;
 
 	folio_batch_init(&free_folios);
 	while (!list_empty(list)) {
 		struct folio *folio = lru_to_folio(list);
 
+		lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
 		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio);
 		list_del(&folio->lru);
 		if (unlikely(!folio_evictable(folio))) {
-			spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+			lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 			folio_putback_lru(folio);
-			spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+			lruvec = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1940,19 +1943,15 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 
 			folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio);
 			if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
-				spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+				lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 				mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
 				free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
-				spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+				lruvec = NULL;
 			}
 
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * All pages were isolated from the same lruvec (and isolation
-		 * inhibits memcg migration).
-		 */
 		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_matches_lruvec(folio, lruvec), folio);
 		lruvec_add_folio(lruvec, folio);
 		nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -1961,11 +1960,12 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 			workingset_age_nonresident(lruvec, nr_pages);
 	}
 
+	if (lruvec)
+		lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
+
 	if (free_folios.nr) {
-		spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
 		free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
-		spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 	}
 
 	return nr_moved;
@@ -2033,9 +2033,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 	nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&folio_list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
-	move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &folio_list);
+	move_folios_to_lru(&folio_list);
 
+	local_irq_disable();
 	__mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),
 					stat.nr_demoted);
 	__mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
@@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 		__count_vm_events(item, nr_reclaimed);
 	__count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), item, nr_reclaimed);
 	__count_vm_events(PGSTEAL_ANON + file, nr_reclaimed);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+	local_irq_enable();
 
 	lru_note_cost(lruvec, file, stat.nr_pageout, nr_scanned - nr_reclaimed);
 
@@ -2183,16 +2183,15 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	/*
 	 * Move folios back to the lru list.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
-
-	nr_activate = move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &l_active);
-	nr_deactivate = move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &l_inactive);
+	nr_activate = move_folios_to_lru(&l_active);
+	nr_deactivate = move_folios_to_lru(&l_inactive);
 
+	local_irq_disable();
 	__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
 	__count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
 
 	__mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+	local_irq_enable();
 
 	if (nr_rotated)
 		lru_note_cost(lruvec, file, 0, nr_rotated);
@@ -4723,14 +4722,15 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap
 			set_mask_bits(&folio->flags, LRU_REFS_FLAGS, BIT(PG_active));
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
-
-	move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &list);
+	move_folios_to_lru(&list);
 
+	local_irq_disable();
 	walk = current->reclaim_state->mm_walk;
 	if (walk && walk->batched) {
 		walk->lruvec = lruvec;
+		spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 		reset_batch_size(walk);
+		spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 	}
 
 	__mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),
@@ -4741,8 +4741,7 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap
 		__count_vm_events(item, reclaimed);
 	__count_memcg_events(memcg, item, reclaimed);
 	__count_vm_events(PGSTEAL_ANON + type, reclaimed);
-
-	spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+	local_irq_enable();
 
 	list_splice_init(&clean, &list);
 
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15  2:45 [PATCH RFC 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 01/28] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code of checking parent memory cgroup Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:35   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 02/28] mm: memcontrol: use folio_memcg_charged() to avoid potential rcu lock holding Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:48   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-18  2:38     ` Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 03/28] mm: workingset: use folio_lruvec() in workingset_refault() Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:52   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 04/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:53   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 05/28] mm: thp: replace folio_memcg() with folio_memcg_charged() Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 06/28] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants Muchun Song
2025-04-17 14:58   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-18 19:50   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-04-19 14:20     ` Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 07/28] mm: thp: use folio_batch to handle THP splitting in deferred_split_scan() Muchun Song
2025-04-30 14:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-06  6:44     ` Hugh Dickins
2025-05-06 21:44       ` Hugh Dickins
2025-05-07  3:30         ` Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2025-04-30 14:49   ` [PATCH RFC 08/28] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru() Johannes Weiner
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 09/28] mm: memcontrol: allocate object cgroup for non-kmem case Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 10/28] mm: memcontrol: return root object cgroup for root memory cgroup Muchun Song
2025-06-28  3:09   ` Chen Ridong
2025-06-30  7:16     ` Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 11/28] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in get_mem_cgroup_from_folio() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 12/28] buffer: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_alloc_buffers() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 13/28] writeback: prevent memory cgroup release in writeback module Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 14/28] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in count_memcg_folio_events() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 15/28] mm: page_io: prevent memory cgroup release in page_io module Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 16/28] mm: migrate: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_migrate_mapping() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 17/28] mm: mglru: prevent memory cgroup release in mglru Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 18/28] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in mem_cgroup_swap_full() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 19/28] mm: workingset: prevent memory cgroup release in lru_gen_eviction() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 20/28] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_refault() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 21/28] mm: zswap: prevent lruvec release in zswap_folio_swapin() Muchun Song
2025-04-17 17:39   ` Nhat Pham
2025-04-18  2:36   ` Chengming Zhou
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 22/28] mm: swap: prevent lruvec release in swap module Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 23/28] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_activation() Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 24/28] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting LRU pages for lruvec lock Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 25/28] mm: thp: prepare for reparenting LRU pages for split queue lock Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 26/28] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2025-06-30 12:47   ` Harry Yoo
2025-07-01 22:12     ` Harry Yoo
2025-07-07  9:29       ` [External] " Muchun Song
2025-07-09  0:14         ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 27/28] mm: memcontrol: eliminate the problem of dying memory cgroup for LRU folios Muchun Song
2025-05-20 11:27   ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-22  2:31     ` Muchun Song
2025-05-23  1:24       ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-15  2:45 ` [PATCH RFC 28/28] mm: lru: add VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO to lru maintenance helpers Muchun Song
2025-04-15  2:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Muchun Song
2025-04-15  6:19 ` Kairui Song
2025-04-15  8:01   ` Muchun Song
2025-04-17 18:22     ` Kairui Song
2025-04-17 19:04       ` Johannes Weiner
2025-06-27  8:50         ` Chen Ridong
2025-04-17 21:45       ` Roman Gushchin
2025-04-28  3:43         ` Kairui Song
2025-06-27  9:02           ` Chen Ridong
2025-06-27 18:54             ` Kairui Song
2025-06-27 19:14               ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-28  9:21                 ` Chen Ridong
2025-04-22 14:20       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-05-23  1:23 ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-23  2:39   ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250415024532.26632-9-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).