From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B2E442C; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 06:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756706790; cv=none; b=RqkBphyYaTZwJxAROYlkEnrUk4BLqcCu/2UhdVp8r/WSlyVcuXsXHzfks8LRMHGvCIGlNlb7DnCURXpLsIeOFTRL9sIAcp2W3JL/aUca5wvuzdY0xJYqhEngFcIKhG5oTg0Q0vq6gvZZFSGIXwgKx1CjCKvoeiBLOA4443rMPWI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756706790; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ThgXBJ7t/gOvaZIzSXHb1QOTtw1F6BppwwSYBkrCJBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PQIJPA83wKsp9PiHRFZ21AwOjxAa5LARjt9AfD1TiuSiW84hpaSNMAAOvZc46aAgUxh2qSP2j5mUUlgTHylGEI4GIFcZlk7DWgj7a6Xqdi4YkCVO3zZRDtzUFg9N5W6equpZV5Kxej4ks7M6CZasspO64GWe11MmE9z9OytrUqI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ULSvrrpJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="ULSvrrpJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9902C4CEF0; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 06:06:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1756706790; bh=ThgXBJ7t/gOvaZIzSXHb1QOTtw1F6BppwwSYBkrCJBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ULSvrrpJdYHxtxcLuyHyhDLAIKg1BhxossjavwfqE6a8YP3W+0+5m5X2+nbkHW0Kz d8z1qeQJj/7X2m6Bg214taQCgWWJhTTaorGV/n7dGy3y9DeBJOS3Cdvwz2gyvQAIxi ImK9mAuLjQeq2a6wLRi45hxDuYSTGo8HRv0LY8cE= Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:06:24 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Chen Ridong Cc: Tejun Heo , hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/psi: Set of->priv to NULL upon file release Message-ID: <2025090113-matcher-scoured-ab39@gregkh> References: <20250822070715.1565236-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> <20250822070715.1565236-3-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> <2025082322-canopener-snugness-14e3@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:38:49AM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote: > > > On 2025/8/26 1:32, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Greg. > > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 08:43:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > >>> Applied to cgroup/for-6.17-fixes. > >> > >> Both or just this second patch? Should I take the first through the > >> driver-core tree, or do you want to take it through the cgroup tree? No > >> objection from me for you to take both :) > > > > Sorry about the lack of clarity. Just the second one. The first one looks > > fine to me but it would probably be more appropriate if you take it. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Hello all, > > Any other opinions? Can this patch be applied? Please give us a chance to catch up with patch reviews :)