Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 10:54:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905085436.95863-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905085436.95863-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.

This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.

This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.

This patch adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request the use of
the per-CPU behavior. Both flags coexist for one release cycle to allow
callers to transition their calls.

Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.

With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.

All existing users have been updated accordingly.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 +-
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index fa24c032ed6f..779d586e191c 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ static int __init cgroup1_wq_init(void)
 	 * Cap @max_active to 1 too.
 	 */
 	cgroup_pidlist_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_pidlist_destroy",
-						    0, 1);
+						    WQ_PERCPU, 1);
 	BUG_ON(!cgroup_pidlist_destroy_wq);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 1e39355194fd..54a66cf0cef9 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -6281,7 +6281,7 @@ static int __init cgroup_wq_init(void)
 	 * We would prefer to do this in cgroup_init() above, but that
 	 * is called before init_workqueues(): so leave this until after.
 	 */
-	cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0, 1);
+	cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", WQ_PERCPU, 1);
 	BUG_ON(!cgroup_destroy_wq);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05  8:54 [PATCH 0/2] cgroup: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Marco Crivellari
2025-09-05  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-09-05  8:54 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-09-05 16:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] cgroup: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Tejun Heo
2025-09-09 10:26   ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905085436.95863-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox