From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
changwoo@igalia.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, liuwenfang@honor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] sched: Move sched_class::prio_changed() into the change pattern
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:44:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251006104527.083607521@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20251006104402.946760805@infradead.org
Move sched_class::prio_changed() into the change pattern.
And while there, extend it with sched_class::get_prio() in order to
fix the deadline sitation.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
kernel/sched/ext.c | 8 +-------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++++--
kernel/sched/idle.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/rt.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 9 ---------
9 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2169,12 +2169,6 @@ inline int task_curr(const struct task_s
return cpu_curr(task_cpu(p)) == p;
}
-void check_prio_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
-{
- if (oldprio != p->prio || dl_task(p))
- p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio);
-}
-
void wakeup_preempt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
struct task_struct *donor = rq->donor;
@@ -7402,9 +7396,6 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct
p->sched_class = next_class;
p->prio = prio;
}
-
- if (!(queue_flag & DEQUEUE_CLASS))
- check_prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio);
out_unlock:
/* Avoid rq from going away on us: */
preempt_disable();
@@ -10860,6 +10851,13 @@ struct sched_change_ctx *sched_change_be
.running = task_current(rq, p),
};
+ if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_CLASS)) {
+ if (p->sched_class->get_prio)
+ ctx->prio = p->sched_class->get_prio(rq, p);
+ else
+ ctx->prio = p->prio;
+ }
+
if (ctx->queued)
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
if (ctx->running)
@@ -10886,6 +10884,10 @@ void sched_change_end(struct sched_chang
if (ctx->running)
set_next_task(rq, p);
- if ((ctx->flags & ENQUEUE_CLASS) && p->sched_class->switched_to)
- p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p);
+ if (ctx->flags & ENQUEUE_CLASS) {
+ if (p->sched_class->switched_to)
+ p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p);
+ } else {
+ p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, ctx->prio);
+ }
}
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -3042,23 +3042,24 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq
}
}
+static u64 get_prio_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return p->dl.deadline;
+}
+
/*
* If the scheduling parameters of a -deadline task changed,
* a push or pull operation might be needed.
*/
-static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
- int oldprio)
+static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 old_deadline)
{
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
return;
- /*
- * This might be too much, but unfortunately
- * we don't have the old deadline value, and
- * we can't argue if the task is increasing
- * or lowering its prio, so...
- */
- if (!rq->dl.overloaded)
+ if (p->dl.deadline == old_deadline)
+ return;
+
+ if (dl_time_before(old_deadline, p->dl.deadline))
deadline_queue_pull_task(rq);
if (task_current_donor(rq, p)) {
@@ -3113,6 +3114,7 @@ DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(dl) = {
.task_tick = task_tick_dl,
.task_fork = task_fork_dl,
+ .get_prio = get_prio_dl,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_dl,
.switched_from = switched_from_dl,
.switched_to = switched_to_dl,
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2961,7 +2961,7 @@ static void reweight_task_scx(struct rq
p, p->scx.weight);
}
-static void prio_changed_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
+static void prio_changed_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 oldprio)
{
}
@@ -3928,9 +3928,6 @@ static void scx_disable_workfn(struct kt
p->sched_class = new_class;
}
- if (!(queue_flags & DEQUEUE_CLASS))
- check_prio_changed(task_rq(p), p, p->prio);
-
scx_exit_task(p);
}
scx_task_iter_stop(&sti);
@@ -4679,9 +4676,6 @@ static int scx_enable(struct sched_ext_o
p->sched_class = new_class;
}
- if (!(queue_flags & DEQUEUE_CLASS))
- check_prio_changed(task_rq(p), p, p->prio);
-
put_task_struct(p);
}
scx_task_iter_stop(&sti);
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -13138,11 +13138,14 @@ static void task_fork_fair(struct task_s
* the current task.
*/
static void
-prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
+prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 oldprio)
{
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
return;
+ if (p->prio == oldprio)
+ return;
+
if (rq->cfs.nr_queued == 1)
return;
@@ -13154,8 +13157,9 @@ prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
if (task_current_donor(rq, p)) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_curr(rq);
- } else
+ } else {
wakeup_preempt(rq, p, 0);
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -504,8 +504,11 @@ static void switching_to_idle(struct rq
}
static void
-prio_changed_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
+prio_changed_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 oldprio)
{
+ if (p->prio == oldprio)
+ return;
+
BUG();
}
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2437,11 +2437,14 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq
* us to initiate a push or pull.
*/
static void
-prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
+prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 oldprio)
{
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
return;
+ if (p->prio == oldprio)
+ return;
+
if (task_current_donor(rq, p)) {
/*
* If our priority decreases while running, we
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2451,8 +2451,10 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*reweight_task)(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
const struct load_weight *lw);
+
+ u64 (*get_prio) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
void (*prio_changed) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
- int oldprio);
+ u64 oldprio);
unsigned int (*get_rr_interval)(struct rq *rq,
struct task_struct *task);
@@ -3877,12 +3879,11 @@ extern void set_load_weight(struct task_
extern void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
extern bool dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
-extern void check_prio_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio);
-
extern struct balance_callback *splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq);
extern void balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head);
struct sched_change_ctx {
+ u64 prio;
struct task_struct *p;
int flags;
bool queued;
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -81,8 +81,11 @@ static void switching_to_stop(struct rq
}
static void
-prio_changed_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
+prio_changed_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 oldprio)
{
+ if (p->prio == oldprio)
+ return;
+
BUG(); /* how!?, what priority? */
}
--- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
@@ -95,12 +95,6 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p
old_prio = p->prio;
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
}
-
- /*
- * If the task increased its priority or is running and
- * lowered its priority, then reschedule its CPU:
- */
- p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, old_prio);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_user_nice);
@@ -708,9 +702,6 @@ int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_str
}
}
- if (!(queue_flags & DEQUEUE_CLASS))
- check_prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio);
-
/* Avoid rq from going away on us: */
preempt_disable();
head = splice_balance_callbacks(rq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-06 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-06 10:44 [PATCH 00/12] sched: Cleanup the change-pattern and related locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched: Employ sched_change guards Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 8:20 ` Andrea Righi
2025-10-08 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-08 6:58 ` Andrea Righi
2025-10-07 16:58 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-10-08 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched: Re-arrange the {EN,DE}QUEUE flags Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-09 13:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-10-09 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-09 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-09 16:50 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-10-13 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class switches Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 15:22 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-06 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-01-12 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched: Move sched_class::prio_changed() into the change pattern Pierre Gondois
2026-01-13 4:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-13 10:45 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-13 11:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-13 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-13 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-13 13:07 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-13 13:10 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-13 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-14 6:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-14 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-14 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-14 14:04 ` luca abeni
2026-01-14 14:20 ` Juri Lelli
2026-01-14 15:25 ` luca abeni
2026-01-15 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-15 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-15 13:13 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-15 13:56 ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched: Fix migrate_disable_switch() locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched: Fix do_set_cpus_allowed() locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-24 14:58 ` [REGRESSION] Deadlock during CPU hotplug caused by abfc01077df6 Jan Polensky
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched: Rename do_set_cpus_allowed() Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched: Make __do_set_cpus_allowed() use the sched_change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched: Add locking comments to sched_class methods Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 9:54 ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-08 7:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-08 7:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-08 9:43 ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-08 10:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-08 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched: Match __task_rq_{,un}lock() Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 20:44 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-06 10:44 ` [PATCH 12/12] sched: Cleanup the sched_change NOCLOCK usage Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 00/12] sched: Cleanup the change-pattern and related locking Andrea Righi
2025-10-07 9:55 ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-07 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-07 20:46 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-08 13:54 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251006104527.083607521@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwenfang@honor.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox