Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mkoutny@suse.com, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
	changwoo@igalia.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, liuwenfang@honor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched/ext: Fold balance_scx() into pick_task_scx()
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:46:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251006105453.769281377@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20251006104652.630431579@infradead.org

With pick_task() having an rf argument, it is possible to do the
lock-break there, get rid of the weird balance/pick_task hack.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  |   13 --------
 kernel/sched/ext.c   |   78 +++++++--------------------------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |    1 
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5845,19 +5845,6 @@ static void prev_balance(struct rq *rq,
 	const struct sched_class *start_class = prev->sched_class;
 	const struct sched_class *class;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
-	/*
-	 * SCX requires a balance() call before every pick_task() including when
-	 * waking up from SCHED_IDLE. If @start_class is below SCX, start from
-	 * SCX instead. Also, set a flag to detect missing balance() call.
-	 */
-	if (scx_enabled()) {
-		rq->scx.flags |= SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING;
-		if (sched_class_above(&ext_sched_class, start_class))
-			start_class = &ext_sched_class;
-	}
-#endif
-
 	/*
 	 * We must do the balancing pass before put_prev_task(), such
 	 * that when we release the rq->lock the task is in the same
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, st
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
 	rq->scx.flags |= SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE;
-	rq->scx.flags &= ~(SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING | SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP);
+	rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP;
 
 	if ((sch->ops.flags & SCX_OPS_HAS_CPU_PREEMPT) &&
 	    unlikely(rq->scx.cpu_released)) {
@@ -2119,40 +2119,6 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, st
 	return true;
 }
 
-static int balance_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
-		       struct rq_flags *rf)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
-
-	ret = balance_one(rq, prev);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-	/*
-	 * When core-sched is enabled, this ops.balance() call will be followed
-	 * by pick_task_scx() on this CPU and the SMT siblings. Balance the
-	 * siblings too.
-	 */
-	if (sched_core_enabled(rq)) {
-		const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu_of(rq));
-		int scpu;
-
-		for_each_cpu_andnot(scpu, smt_mask, cpumask_of(cpu_of(rq))) {
-			struct rq *srq = cpu_rq(scpu);
-			struct task_struct *sprev = srq->curr;
-
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(__rq_lockp(rq) != __rq_lockp(srq));
-			update_rq_clock(srq);
-			balance_one(srq, sprev);
-		}
-	}
-#endif
-	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static void process_ddsp_deferred_locals(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct task_struct *p;
@@ -2335,38 +2301,19 @@ static struct task_struct *first_local_t
 static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
 	struct task_struct *prev = rq->curr;
+	bool keep_prev, kick_idle = false;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-	bool keep_prev = rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP;
-	bool kick_idle = false;
 
-	/*
-	 * WORKAROUND:
-	 *
-	 * %SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP should be set iff $prev is on SCX as it must just
-	 * have gone through balance_scx(). Unfortunately, there currently is a
-	 * bug where fair could say yes on balance() but no on pick_task(),
-	 * which then ends up calling pick_task_scx() without preceding
-	 * balance_scx().
-	 *
-	 * Keep running @prev if possible and avoid stalling from entering idle
-	 * without balancing.
-	 *
-	 * Once fair is fixed, remove the workaround and trigger WARN_ON_ONCE()
-	 * if pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx().
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING)) {
-		if (prev->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) {
-			keep_prev = true;
-		} else {
-			keep_prev = false;
-			kick_idle = true;
-		}
-	} else if (unlikely(keep_prev &&
-			    prev->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)) {
-		/*
-		 * Can happen while enabling as SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING assertion is
-		 * conditional on scx_enabled() and may have been skipped.
-		 */
+	rq->queue_mask = 0;
+	rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+	balance_one(rq, prev);
+	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+	if (rq->queue_mask & ~((ext_sched_class.queue_mask << 1)-1))
+		return RETRY_TASK;
+
+	keep_prev = rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP;
+	if (unlikely(keep_prev &&
+		     prev->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(scx_enable_state() == SCX_ENABLED);
 		keep_prev = false;
 	}
@@ -3243,7 +3190,6 @@ DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(ext) = {
 
 	.wakeup_preempt		= wakeup_preempt_scx,
 
-	.balance		= balance_scx,
 	.pick_task		= pick_task_scx,
 
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_scx,
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -779,7 +779,6 @@ enum scx_rq_flags {
 	 */
 	SCX_RQ_ONLINE		= 1 << 0,
 	SCX_RQ_CAN_STOP_TICK	= 1 << 1,
-	SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING	= 1 << 2, /* balance hasn't run yet */
 	SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP		= 1 << 3, /* balance decided to keep current */
 	SCX_RQ_BYPASSING	= 1 << 4,
 	SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID	= 1 << 5, /* RQ clock is fresh and valid */



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 10:46 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched/ext: Cleanup pick_task_scx() Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 10:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Detect per-class runqueue changes Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 10:08   ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-07 10:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 10:26       ` Juri Lelli
2025-10-06 10:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] sched: Add support to pick functions to take rf Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-08 13:16   ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-08 13:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-08 15:22       ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-08 20:34         ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-09  7:17           ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-13 11:04             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-13 11:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-13 13:06                 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-13 17:20                   ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-06 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-10-07 12:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched/ext: Cleanup pick_task_scx() Christian Loehle
2025-10-07 21:48 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-08  9:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-08 20:21     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251006105453.769281377@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuwenfang@honor.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox