From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB421917F1 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760489148; cv=none; b=rZwDXx5/Gd8+aPRT92eoAy7VpdQmbWG4iDteluOZjDCjjkLaPPJZNjy21wAVqHXulcpcJFr9aXChBUsGHqj1MvuAaN5MUDz3PTZjDW/MnXFnw17sE5sa2LFyZMysIjtpS9P74iM96T7gTEXK0ks6sFyQ8H8XLa2EjnwEn0oa7Aw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760489148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QWZy/15xnGTRgPkf5Pka44YljXIi4GDc0D994BUVp4o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZsVDkFT1fDGuLBUnu8uGOdzwdBJ5knhSb73wA3hy1AjOBrhf7VM023JJNnWb/1ZNJQ7fx/HVVpM/3GmIAyI1H6Qjrny0uUkyvcno/BObAtIZCUIkpHHDLof4k+wgWl8+qWKDtxm1LvsVidZKn+wtif+TT7jtit8n/c8/M2efw8Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=KvNpFVhW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KvNpFVhW" Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46e2c3b6d4cso45342845e9.3 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1760489145; x=1761093945; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JjS2vWmWFupijvTyxg2fppwPWWk6ldlFSBLrc+f8lsk=; b=KvNpFVhWTFELaiAqhGS7x0NZitH5f/OLep4v15djPHyrq2Aw0JK/6IzoelOW6F0GPJ +yRBedJHiUictgIiytF/0wNS0as6BP6LzvOLlexN4eBhOWFCtQLScIXuzOg1SuIAj96M mpnU6tfZXlhDxptdn3GuNYMV+o2z3XF8AFjHHhKh7TK1DEW2Z98vdeOzn4AE9vx+aNmS inVWfnvAl9FbiBnmAxIKq04ZcxhajQAUlE4v+al1Ix9nKCiBujpEtcZ9PQAJQ/tim5Xa A0tAH8udGup9ls+eP4G7sKZ6UTOLuEFmNPu72c+1W/T0AgzqaUvbow9D/b4EbOsfEo/J U/0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760489145; x=1761093945; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JjS2vWmWFupijvTyxg2fppwPWWk6ldlFSBLrc+f8lsk=; b=TMALiNkbI76b+NcCy8xEl5ajKrSvd1fzeWKi6mmEdEGqHkOzpREGzuFbmPR/HI79uD Hq2cIBk8t1OpuB7TkRVDwTQcfQ0lyFDcjWX66GgFESuKQRgO0yao+MmEqfGEgDTuYdZS CIhjsZWcxHh3EZ9XwcKkf6M92Ox2OfG1xZU5SFc89UGqk1rEksMC9IoNZpbwsz9B+LQ8 ur8NvV5FUMad61tzDJ1h5Bw+8tg/m8dBAtpKVpYPFDdlvW9k2fqRQakDSWec+9V7WHon RF6pV5YvzjfZ4QmRdbi/FO01keT5rYy/aCmbAq/hAp2cpNJ2LXcervCbD3Nr31iw8Dxu yPow== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUdwWPZF75vne+pzZZWDnRpzzbZbhxnL88TG0UoXCQTkYu65gEM9LDGnYKfdb9ChwEQgjzZHv1k@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+w1d8sgoyyXTHBz6C+QzzOdMzHMDgh5wn0HOXzgnmPNSg0ihX uuMC0DN4isTUOFH9+5E3qNZuW5K4giBpQiuD9CmWRLCqyMgZHX7+DoQL X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuN+tAzL6LOUw4nOW/bszWisqZ4z1Y/dOv/0AuCAjIowXXTkipvpDZXqUIOspi wvfpdrnisg/+s221Vn/EiHeOfvlwes6jMZAoshG14attSOQlTZvaVv13XF3A/IpSrKQI5KgndTd CpcBu4Dp+io08ZLlbN/TIz87hIesBhlTVsF/5bFsH/i+6H/ySteyXJcYnAPZhGaNAR+f3pyJx1A IPi2b71Vm9ow5MSxOxJG8Zc/gNGidDJMVzXt7si6LWry88wFbQhXLFsBtenYhy9hob2OJxAzjhv V8DL0QBNNB1kpD83d/tfXTn+u9dBqHctWamUOTiHrinr12wTg84IynFe+v3Rul/dI3d9q8Bb/FP kWi9tyX1skw1D/C0QRsdLnCu/uMKWK/RMqSYVfSEZ0iSMNGtv+rU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEUsuN0HzcjvOiasKjxoAVXbiNobka2YXSRTY/9Up4v1JrTdSmA4WVnfLZUCScJw93cZ5lkow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600d:42f2:b0:46e:4341:7302 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46fb15396d6mr133011165e9.34.1760489144718; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-46fc155143fsm220567755e9.11.2025.10.14.17.45.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:45:43 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Wei Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Jonathan Corbet , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Muchun Song , "Liam R. Howlett" , Lorenzo Stoakes , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] mm: stop maintaining the per-page mapcount of large folios (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) Message-ID: <20251015004543.md5x4cjtkyjzpf4b@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20250303163014.1128035-1-david@redhat.com> <20250303163014.1128035-21-david@redhat.com> <20251014122335.dpyk5advbkioojnm@master> <71380b43-c23c-42b5-8aab-f158bb37bc75@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:38:38PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >On 14.10.25 16:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 02:59:30PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> > > As commit 349994cf61e6 mentioned, we don't support partially mapped PUD-sized >> > > folio yet. >> > >> > We do support partially mapped PUD-sized folios I think, but not anonymous >> > PUD-sized folios. >> >> I don't think so? The only mechanism I know of to allocate PUD-sized >> chunks of memory is hugetlb, and that doesn't permit partial mappings. > >Greetings from the latest DAX rework :) After a re-think, do you think it's better to align the behavior between CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT and CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT? It looks we treat a PUD-sized folio partially_mapped if CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT, but !partially_mapped if CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT, if my understanding is correct. > >-- >Cheers > >David / dhildenb -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me