* Re: [PATCH 03/15] sched/isolation: Separate housekeeping types in enum hk_type
[not found] <20260325135904.GB3738786@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
@ 2026-03-30 11:44 ` Qiliang Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Qiliang Yuan @ 2026-03-30 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: longman, cgroups, akpm, anna-maria, boqun.feng, bsegall,
dietmar.eggemann, frederic, hannes, jackmanb, jiangshanlai,
joelagnelf, josh, juri.lelli, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest,
linux-mm, mathieu.desnoyers, mgorman, mhocko, mingo, mingo,
neeraj.upadhyay, paulmck, qiang.zhang, rcu, realwujing, rostedt,
shuah, surenb, tglx, tj, urezki, vbabka, vincent.guittot,
vschneid, ziy
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 02:59:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> What the hell for?
Direct and to the point. The original intent was to allow for asymmetric
isolation (e.g. offloading RCU callbacks while keeping specific timers
local for very specialized real-time monitoring).
However, I agree that for 99% of use cases, this is unnecessary
complexity. In V13, I will consolidate these independent enum types
into a unified housekeeping mask to simplify the configuration and
reduce the "insane configuration space" you mentioned earlier.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread