From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstultz@google.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, qyousef@layalina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 12:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521103117.GC3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ag3iC-jH6HPoWKGo@vingu-cube>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 06:32:11PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I finally fount the root cause of regression: the update of entity lag happened
> after the task has been dequeued which screwed update_entity_lag():
>
> update_entity_lag must be called after updating curr and cfs_rd and before
> clearing on_rq
>
> With the fix below I'm back to original hackbench figures and maybe even a bit better.
> I haven't checked shceduling latency yet
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 77d0e1937f2c..32fe57004f27 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5753,6 +5753,9 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>
> update_stats_dequeue_fair(cfs_rq, se, flags);
>
> + if (entity_is_task(se))
> + update_entity_lag(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs, se);
> +
> se->on_rq = 0;
> account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
>
> @@ -7423,6 +7426,7 @@ static bool __dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> if (sched_feat(DELAY_DEQUEUE) && delay &&
> !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se)) {
> update_load_avg(cfs_rq_of(se), se, 0);
> + update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se);
> set_delayed(se);
> return false;
> }
> @@ -7430,7 +7434,6 @@ static bool __dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>
> dequeue_hierarchy(p, flags);
>
> - update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se);
> if (sched_feat(PLACE_REL_DEADLINE) && !task_sleep) {
> se->deadline -= se->vruntime;
> se->rel_deadline = 1;
Argh!!! Thank you! I've gone blind staring at all this :/
Would it not be simpler to just move the update_entity_lag() call up a
bit, like so?
---
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7999,6 +7999,9 @@ static bool __dequeue_task(struct rq *rq
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
+ update_curr(cfs_rq);
+ update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se);
+
if (flags & DEQUEUE_DELAYED) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!se->sched_delayed);
} else {
@@ -8022,7 +8025,6 @@ static bool __dequeue_task(struct rq *rq
dequeue_hierarchy(p, flags);
- update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se);
if (sched_feat(PLACE_REL_DEADLINE) && !task_sleep) {
se->deadline -= se->vruntime;
se->rel_deadline = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 11:31 [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] sched/debug: Use char * instead of char (*)[] Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] sched: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for preempt_dynamic_mode Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] sched/debug: Collapse subsequent CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT sections Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode switch Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: UP Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: MAX Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: CONCUR Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] sched/fair: Add newidle balance to pick_task_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 5:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 15:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-03 9:51 ` Aaron Lu
2026-06-11 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] sched: Remove sched_class::pick_next_task() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 15:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 16:21 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 7:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 4:51 ` John Stultz
2026-05-13 5:00 ` John Stultz
2026-05-14 1:36 ` John Stultz
2026-05-14 2:53 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-14 3:14 ` John Stultz
2026-05-19 10:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-20 16:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-21 2:57 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-21 7:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-21 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-21 12:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-21 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-21 13:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-21 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-21 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-21 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-21 13:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-26 7:53 ` Zhang Qiao
2026-05-26 9:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 9:36 ` Zhang Qiao
2026-05-26 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 10:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Tejun Heo
2026-05-12 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-18 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-18 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-27 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 8:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-12 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-13 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-18 13:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-18 21:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 10:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-19 16:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-16 3:30 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521103117.GC3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox