From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next v6 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix node inconsistencies between cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and cpuset_attach()
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 11:02:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604150229.414135-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604150229.414135-1-longman@redhat.com>
Whenever memory node mask is changed, there are 4 places where the node
mask has to be updated or used.
1) task's node mask via cpuset_change_task_nodemask()
2) memory policy binding via mpol_rebind_mm()
3) if memory migration is enabled, migrate from old_mems_allowed to
the new node mask via cpuset_migrate_mm().
4) setting old_mems_allowed
These memory actions are done in cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and
cpuset_attach(). However there are inconsistencies in what node masks
are being used in these 2 functions.
In cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(),
- cpuset_change_task_nodemask(): guarantee_online_mems()
- mpol_rebind_mm(): mems_allowed
- cpuset_migrate_mm(): guarantee_online_mems()
- old_mems_allowed: guarantee_online_mems()
In cpuset_attach(),
- cpuset_change_task_nodemask(): guarantee_online_mems()
- mpol_rebind_mm(): effective_mems
- cpuset_migrate_mm(): effective_mems
- old_mems_allowed: effective_mems
These inconsistencies dates back to quite a long time ago and it is
hard to say what should be the correct values.
The guarantee_online_mems() function returns a node mask from current or
an ancestor cpuset that is a subset of node_states[N_MEMORY]. Nodes in
node_states[N_MEMORY] are all online, i.e. in node_states[N_ONLINE].
However, node in node_states[N_ONLINE] may not have memory. So
node_states[N_MEMORY] should be a subset of node_states[N_ONLINE].
The guarantee_online_mems() function should only be useful for v1 where
mems_allowed is the same as effective_mems. With v2, the memory nodes
in effective_mems should always be a subset of node_states[N_MEMORY].
The only time that may not be true is when a memory hot-unplug operation
is in progress and a memory node is removed from node_states[N_MEMORY]
but not yet reflected in effective_mems as cpuset_handle_hotplug()
has not yet been called from cpuset_track_online_nodes(). When
cpuset_handle_hotplug() is called later, the memory node setting
of the relevant cpusets and tasks will be updated. So replacing the
guarantee_online_mems() call by just using cs->effective_mems should
be fine.
Let use the following setup for both of them and make them consistent.
- cpuset_change_task_nodemask(): guarantee_online_mems()
- mpol_rebind_mm(): effective_mems
- cpuset_migrate_mm(): guarantee_online_mems()
- old_mems_allowed: guarantee_online_mems()
So for v2, it is effectively all effective_mems. For v1, mpol_rebind_mm()
uses mems_allowed which may differ from what guarantee_online_mems()
returns.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 6bdb68689c24..8305b5830c3c 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -489,7 +489,10 @@ static void guarantee_active_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
* Return in *pmask the portion of a cpusets's mems_allowed that
* are online, with memory. If none are online with memory, walk
* up the cpuset hierarchy until we find one that does have some
- * online mems. The top cpuset always has some mems online.
+ * online mems. The top cpuset always has some mems online. With v2,
+ * effective_mems should always contain online memory nodes except
+ * during the transition period where a memory node hotunplug operation
+ * is in progress.
*
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of node_states[N_MEMORY].
@@ -498,6 +501,10 @@ static void guarantee_active_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
*/
static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
{
+ if (cpuset_v2()) {
+ *pmask = cs->effective_mems;
+ return;
+ }
while (!nodes_and(*pmask, cs->effective_mems, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
cs = parent_cs(cs);
}
@@ -2616,6 +2623,13 @@ static void *cpuset_being_rebound;
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its mems_allowed to the
* effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_mutex held,
* cpuset membership stays stable.
+ *
+ * - cpuset_change_task_nodemask(): guarantee_online_mems()
+ * - mpol_rebind_mm(): effective_mems
+ * - cpuset_migrate_mm(): guarantee_online_mems()
+ * - old_mems_allowed: guarantee_online_mems()
+ *
+ * For v2, guarantee_online_mems() should just return effective_mems.
*/
void cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
{
@@ -2624,7 +2638,6 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
struct task_struct *task;
cpuset_being_rebound = cs; /* causes mpol_dup() rebind */
-
guarantee_online_mems(cs, &newmems);
/*
@@ -2650,7 +2663,7 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
migrate = is_memory_migrate(cs);
- mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cs->mems_allowed);
+ mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cs->effective_mems);
if (migrate)
cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &cs->old_mems_allowed, &newmems);
else
@@ -3148,17 +3161,18 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
/*
* In the default hierarchy, enabling cpuset in the child cgroups
- * will trigger a number of cpuset_attach() calls with no change
- * in effective cpus and mems. In that case, we can optimize out
- * by skipping the task iteration and update.
+ * will trigger a cpuset_attach() call with no change in effective cpus
+ * and mems. In that case, we can optimize out by skipping the task
+ * iteration and update.
*/
- if (cpuset_v2() && !cpus_updated && !mems_updated) {
+ if (cpuset_v2()) {
cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->effective_mems;
- goto out;
+ if (!cpus_updated && !mems_updated)
+ goto out;
+ } else {
+ guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
}
- guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
-
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset)
cpuset_attach_task(cs, task);
@@ -3168,7 +3182,6 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
* if there is no change in effective_mems and CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE is
* not set.
*/
- cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->effective_mems;
if (!is_memory_migrate(cs) && !mems_updated)
goto out;
@@ -3176,7 +3189,7 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(leader);
if (mm) {
- mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
+ mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cs->effective_mems);
/*
* old_mems_allowed is the same with mems_allowed
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 15:02 [PATCH-next v6 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-04 15:02 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-06-05 7:48 ` [PATCH-next v6 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix node inconsistencies between cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and cpuset_attach() Ridong Chen
2026-06-05 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-07 3:29 ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-04 15:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Add a cpuset_reserve_dl_bw() helper Waiman Long
2026-06-04 15:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() Waiman Long
2026-06-04 15:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset_attach_old_cs track task group leaders Waiman Long
2026-06-04 15:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Move mpol_rebind_mm/cpuset_migrate_mm() calls inside cpuset_attach_task() Waiman Long
2026-06-04 15:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 6/6] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-05 0:02 ` [PATCH-next v6 7/6] cgroup/cpuset: Set old_mems_allowed from guarantee_online_mems() consistently Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604150229.414135-2-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox