Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: bypass the reclaim and oom killer for dying tasks once oom_reaper is done
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:46:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729024612.3369005-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)

At Meta, we are seeing instances where an OOM killed job is stuck in the
exit path for several hours. In one particular case, the job was stuck
for more than 8 hours and I had to manually remove the memory.max limits
to allow the process to exit.

The job was a single process job and had ~55 GiB memory.max and zswap
enabled. It had almost 0 anon in memory and ~111 GiB in zswap compressed
to ~51 GiB zswap pool (i.e. almost all of memory.current was zswap).
Nothing was left on the LRUs to reclaim.

On further inspection, I observed ~20k threads of that process stuck
with the following stack:

[<0>] mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x4e/0xa0
[<0>] charge_memcg+0x8bf/0x990
[<0>] mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio+0x4e/0x80
[<0>] __read_swap_cache_async+0x10c/0x260
[<0>] swapin_readahead+0x116/0x3f0
[<0>] do_swap_page+0x13c/0x1ce0
[<0>] handle_mm_fault+0x61d/0x11f0
[<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x3e7/0x6d0
[<0>] exc_page_fault+0x8f/0x110
[<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[<0>] __get_user_8+0x14/0x20
[<0>] futex_cleanup+0x27/0x1c0
[<0>] futex_exit_release+0x47/0x60
[<0>] do_exit+0x107/0x940
[<0>] do_group_exit+0x81/0xa0
[<0>] get_signal+0x2b1/0x6e0
[<0>] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x1a/0x1c0
[<0>] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xa8/0x1c0
[<0>] do_syscall_64+0x152/0x250
[<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

In addition the dmesg was filled with "Out of memory and no killable
processes..." messages.

I have no idea why oom reaper was not able to reap/unmap the process. My
guess is that since oom reaper tries to acquire mmap_lock in read mode
limited number of times and then gives up, there might be a thread of
that process which had mmap_lock in write mode at that time.

My initial suspicion was the futex_cleanup and kernel page fault causing
infinite fault and charge retries but that was put to rest in previous
discussions happened on similar problem [1].

My current theory is that it is just a simple slow serialization behind
the oom_lock. Unlike page allocator, memcg charge code takes the
oom_lock without the "try". Though memcg oom code uses
mutex_lock_killable(), note that in the call stack get_signal() consumes
SIGKILL (or sigdelset(SIGKILL)) before calling do_group_exit(). So this
mutex_lock_killable() is just a mutex_lock() here. Therefore 10s of
thousands of threads are waiting on oom_lock and one by one they get
-EFAULT from get_user() in the futex cleanup code and bails out.

Discussion from [1] lead to the commit a75ffa26122b ("memcg, oom: do not
bypass oom killer for dying tasks") which routes dying tasks into the OOM
path precisely so the oom_reaper can reap their mm and free the memory
asynchronously. But the reaper is best-effort and one-shot: if it cannot
take mmap_lock for read (e.g. a sibling thread holds it for write) it
sets MMF_OOM_SKIP and never retries, leaving only the glacial
oom_lock-serialized synchronous drain.

Once MMF_OOM_SKIP is set there is no more asynchronous reclaim coming for
the mm, so a dying task charging against it has nothing left to wait for:
it frees its memory only once it finishes exiting. Running reclaim and the
(no-victim) OOM killer for it is then pointless, and doing it for 10s of
thousands of exiting threads is what serializes them behind oom_lock. So
before reclaim, if current is an OOM victim whose reaper is done, fail the
charge.

Reproduced with 20k threads, each parking a robust futex head on
its own zswapped page, OOM-group-killed while a sibling holds mmap_lock
for write so the reaper gives up and sets MMF_OOM_SKIP. Tested on
next-20260728 and baseline show ~90 seconds exit time while with the
patch the exit time reduced to ~3 seconds.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/7a4e5591f45df455e6a485fc5400989569d3d22d.camel@surriel.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8319ad8c5c23..f7a5f8a6cfee 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2653,6 +2653,19 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask))
 		goto nomem;
 
+	/*
+	 * OOM victim still needs to charge memory to exit. OOM reaper should
+	 * help but it might fail on mmap_lock contention. If the victim is a
+	 * large thread group then all exiting threads might compete on oom_lock
+	 * just to learn that there is nothing really killable anymore. Bail
+	 * out early and fail the charge to expedite their exit. They are
+	 * considered fully reclaimed by the oom reaper and they shouldn't
+	 * contribute further charges.
+	 */
+	if (tsk_is_oom_victim(current) &&
+	    mm_flags_test(MMF_OOM_SKIP, current->signal->oom_mm))
+		goto nomem;
+
 	__memcg_memory_event(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_MAX, allow_spinning);
 	raised_max_event = true;
 
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260729024612.3369005-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox