From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org
Cc: shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] block: skip the blkcg walk in blk_cgroup_congested() when nothing is throttled
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 11:37:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806183742.946953-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
blk_cgroup_congested() walks the current task's blkcg ancestor chain on every
readahead decision and, once swap is in use, on every anonymous and shmem
folio allocation. The answer is almost always "no", but finding that out
costs two loads *per level* on two cold cache lines, plus an out-of-line
kthread_blkcg() and an RCU read-side pair. On a fleet profile of hosts
running containers with 5-10 level hierarchies it costs about as much as all
of mutex_lock(), 99.4% of it under __folio_throttle_swaprate().
Patch 3 gates the walk on a global count of blkcgs with a non-zero
congestion_count, so the common case is a load and a predicted branch.
That only works if the count is correctly maintained, currently two teardown
paths can leave a blkcg permanently marked congested. Today that only hurts
tasks in the affected cgroup, but it hurts them for the life of the cgroup -
readahead cut to a single page, async readahead skipped, and a throttle
scheduled on every anonymous folio allocation. With a global gate it would
cost every other task on the machine the walk as well. Patches 1 and 2 fix
those two paths and stand on their own as bugfixes; patch 3 depends on them.
Usama Arif (3):
blk-iolatency: clear delay state when freeing policy data
blk-iocost: clear delay state when freeing policy data
block: skip blkcg walk in blk_cgroup_congested() when nothing
throttled
block/blk-cgroup.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
block/blk-cgroup.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++++
block/blk-iolatency.c | 9 +++++++++
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 18:37 Usama Arif [this message]
2026-08-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-iolatency: clear delay state when freeing policy data Usama Arif
2026-08-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-iocost: " Usama Arif
2026-08-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: skip blkcg walk in blk_cgroup_congested() when nothing throttled Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806183742.946953-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox