From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:27:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016052811.3085635-1-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
On our production fleet, we saw mem_cgroup_sk_charge() spent over
3x the cycles of try_charge_memcg() although the former should be
a thin wrapper of the latter.
Looking at perf during tcp_rr, most of the cycles were spent in
mod_memcg_state(MEMCG_SOCK), which incurred two heavy memory stalls
due to cache line misses:
mem_cgroup_sk_charge vmlinux [Percent: local period]
...
1.74 │ mov cpu_number,%esi
0.70 │ movslq %ebx,%rcx
0.31 │ mov 0x518(%r14),%rdx
8.99 │ add %rcx,%gs:0x18(%rdx,%rax,8)
^-- this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
in mod_memcg_state()
>> 31.21 │ test %ebx,%ebx
0.05 │ ↓ je 97
│ mov %r14,%rdi
│ → call __css_rstat_updated
0.31 │ mov 0x518(%r14),%rdx
│ 72: test %rdx,%rdx
0.06 │ ↓ je 97
│ mov this_cpu_off,%rsi
0.17 │ mov 0x10(%rsi,%rdx,1),%rax
6.59 │ mov 0xc18(%rax),%eax
^-- atomic_read(&vmstats->stats_updates)
in memcg_vmstats_needs_flush()
>> 26.02 │ mov __num_online_cpus,%ecx
...
0.65 │ e5: mov %r14,%rdi
│ mov %edx,%esi
1.88 │ mov %ebx,%edx
│ → call try_charge_memcg
1.56 │ xor %ebp,%ebp
0.18 │ test %eax,%eax
0.22 │ ↑ jne 9f
│ ↑ jmp 31
This series adds nr_sock[] to struct memcg_stock_pcp to batch
mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK.
With this change, tcp_rr w/ 20000 flows achieves ~9% more
throughput and the TCP stack spends far fewer cycles on memcg.
tcp_rr (20000 flows, 128 threads, 60s, average of 3 runs):
Metric | Baseline | Patched | Diff
---------------------------+----------------+----------------+--------
Throughput (RPS) | 22,408,523 | 24,360,262 | +8.71%
Latency Mean (us) | 891.92 | 820.31 | -8.03%
Latency p50 (us) | 877.22 | 744.10 | -15.18%
Latency p90 (us) | 1,085.43 | 1,082.02 | -0.31%
perf cycles (20000 flows, 10s, average of 3 runs):
Server (M cycles / %) | Baseline | Patched | Diff
---------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+--------
Host Total Cycles | 4,994,342 M | 4,793,242 M | -4.0%
tcp_rcv_established() | 213,968 M (4.283%) | 210,418 M (4.390%) | -1.7%
mem_cgroup_sk_charge() | 12,322 M (0.247%) | 6,390 M (0.133%) | -48.1%
try_charge_memcg() | 8,326 M (0.167%) | 0 M (0.000%) | -100.0%
mem_cgroup_sk_uncharge() | 7,492 M (0.150%) | 5,752 M (0.120%) | -23.2%
refill_stock() | 7,988 M (0.160%) | 0 M (0.000%) | -100.0%
Charge Total | 20,648 M (0.413%) | 6,390 M (0.133%) | -69.1%
Uncharge Total | 15,480 M (0.310%) | 5,752 M (0.120%) | -62.8%
Memcg Sock Total | 36,128 M (0.723%) | 12,142 M (0.253%) | -66.4%
Kuniyuki Iwashima (5):
memcg: Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE() under memcg_stock.lock.
memcg: Reduce nesting in consume_stock() and refill_stock().
memcg: Annotate slow paths in consume_stock() and refill_stock().
memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK.
selftests: cgroup: Deflake test_memcg_sock() in test_memcontrol.c.
mm/memcontrol.c | 155 +++++++++++++-----
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 9 +-
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0.212.g129ede20d9-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 5:27 Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-10-16 5:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] memcg: Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE() under memcg_stock.lock Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-16 5:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] memcg: Reduce nesting in consume_stock() and refill_stock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-16 5:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] memcg: Annotate slow paths " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-16 5:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-16 5:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: cgroup: Deflake test_memcg_sock() in test_memcontrol.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016052811.3085635-1-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox