From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK.
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:50:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028185034.3607746-5-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028185034.3607746-1-kuniyu@google.com>
On our production fleet, we saw mem_cgroup_sk_charge() spent over
3x the cycles of try_charge_memcg() although the former should be
a thin wrapper of the latter.
Looking at perf during tcp_rr, most of the cycles were spent in
mod_memcg_state(MEMCG_SOCK), which incurred two heavy memory stalls
due to cache line misses:
mem_cgroup_sk_charge vmlinux [Percent: local period]
...
1.74 │ mov cpu_number,%esi
0.70 │ movslq %ebx,%rcx
0.31 │ mov 0x518(%r14),%rdx
8.99 │ add %rcx,%gs:0x18(%rdx,%rax,8)
^-- this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
in mod_memcg_state()
>> 31.21 │ test %ebx,%ebx
0.05 │ ↓ je 97
│ mov %r14,%rdi
│ → call __css_rstat_updated
0.31 │ mov 0x518(%r14),%rdx
│ 72: test %rdx,%rdx
0.06 │ ↓ je 97
│ mov this_cpu_off,%rsi
0.17 │ mov 0x10(%rsi,%rdx,1),%rax
6.59 │ mov 0xc18(%rax),%eax
^-- atomic_read(&vmstats->stats_updates)
in memcg_vmstats_needs_flush()
>> 26.02 │ mov __num_online_cpus,%ecx
...
0.65 │ e5: mov %r14,%rdi
│ mov %edx,%esi
1.88 │ mov %ebx,%edx
│ → call try_charge_memcg
1.56 │ xor %ebp,%ebp
0.18 │ test %eax,%eax
0.22 │ ↑ jne 9f
│ ↑ jmp 31
Even worse, after the 2nd cache line miss, the subsequent
atomic_add() for statc->vmstats->stats_updates invalidates the
cache for other CPUs.
Moreover, try_charge_memcg() returned just after consume_stock()
in most cases, but it was not inlined even with FDO.
Usually, skb is charged and uncharged immediately, and caching
the counter in struct memcg_stock_pcp helps.
Let's reduce NR_MEMCG_STOCK from 7 to 6 to fit nr_sock[] in the
single cacheline of struct memcg_stock_pcp, inline the fast path
of consume_stock(), and batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK
(-64, 64).
With this change, tcp_rr w/ 10000 flows achieves ~29% more
throughput with lower latency on machine w/ AMD EPYC 7B12 64-Core
Processor (Zen 2 Rome, 2 sockets, 256 vCPU), and the TCP stack
spends far fewer cycles on memcg.
tcp_rr (10000 flows, 128 threads, 60s, average of 3 runs):
Metric | Baseline | Patched | Diff
---------------------------+----------------+----------------+--------
Throughput (RPS) | 20,884,499 | 26,960,730 | +29.09%
Latency Mean (us) | 478.46 | 370.50 | -22.56%
Latency p50 (us) | 453.96 | 361.80 | -20.30%
Latency p90 (us) | 669.00 | 482.98 | -27.81%
Latency p99 (us) | 969.38 | 622.92 | -35.74%
perf cycles (10000 flows, 10s, average of 3 runs):
Server (M cycles / %) | Baseline | Patched | Diff
---------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+--------
Host Total Cycles | 4,566,914 M | 4,575,636 M | +0.2%
tcp_rcv_established() | 158,009 M (3.460%) | 152,520 M (3.333%) | -3.5%
mem_cgroup_sk_charge() | 18,420 M (0.403%) | 7,474 M (0.163%) | -59.4%
mem_cgroup_sk_uncharge() | 16,593 M (0.363%) | 8,541 M (0.187%) | -48.5%
__css_rstat_updated() | 3,502 M (0.077%) | 0 M (0.000%) | -100.0%
Memcg Sock Total | 38,515 M (0.843%) | 16,015 M (0.350%) | -58.4%
As a side effect, "sock" in memory.stat can be off by up to
MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH pages per CPU until the slot is drained,
like memory.current with nr_pages[]. This is acceptable, as
flushing nr_sock[] every 2 seconds (FLUSH_TIME) across all CPUs
would rather cause cache line invalidation and hurt performance.
Note that MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH is unsigned int, so (int) cast is
needed, and stock_sock is declared as int rather than int8_t
to avoid potential overflow for MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH > 64 and to
generate better asm without 8-bit partial-register operations
or extra sign-extension before mod_memcg_state().
Also, __always_inline is needed for both __consume_stock() and
__refill_stock(), otherwise, FDO branch weight is calculated
from two callers with mixed states (nr_sock == 0 vs nr_sock != 0).
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
v2
* Benchmark again after rebase and update numbers
* Check in_nmi() in __refill_stock()
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a04b44656b38..b92e952c076a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2065,9 +2065,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_group(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
/*
* The value of NR_MEMCG_STOCK is selected to keep the cached memcgs and their
- * nr_pages in a single cacheline. This may change in future.
+ * nr_pages and nr_sock in a single cacheline. This may change in future.
*/
-#define NR_MEMCG_STOCK 7
+#define NR_MEMCG_STOCK 6
/*
* Watermarks for a charge stock slot, in the spirit of pcp->high and
@@ -2081,6 +2081,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_group(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
struct memcg_stock_pcp {
local_trylock_t lock;
uint8_t nr_pages[NR_MEMCG_STOCK];
+ int8_t nr_sock[NR_MEMCG_STOCK];
struct mem_cgroup *cached[NR_MEMCG_STOCK];
struct work_struct work;
@@ -2140,9 +2141,10 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg);
/**
- * consume_stock: Try to consume stocked charge on this cpu.
+ * __consume_stock: Try to consume stocked charge on this cpu.
* @memcg: memcg to consume from.
* @nr_pages: how many pages to charge.
+ * @nr_sock: how many pages to account for MEMCG_SOCK.
*
* Consume the cached charge if enough nr_pages are present otherwise return
* failure. Also return failure for charge request larger than
@@ -2150,10 +2152,13 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
*
* returns true if successful, false otherwise.
*/
-static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
+static __always_inline bool __consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned int nr_pages,
+ unsigned int nr_sock)
{
struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
uint8_t stock_pages;
+ int stock_sock = 0;
bool ret = false;
int i;
@@ -2173,7 +2178,19 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
stock_pages -= nr_pages;
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], stock_pages);
- if (unlikely(!stock_pages)) {
+
+ if (nr_sock) {
+ stock_sock = stock->nr_sock[i] + nr_sock;
+
+ if (likely(stock_sock < (int)MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i], stock_sock);
+ stock_sock = 0;
+ } else {
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i], 0);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(!stock_pages && !stock->nr_sock[i])) {
WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached[i], NULL);
css_put(&memcg->css);
}
@@ -2184,9 +2201,17 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
local_unlock(&memcg_stock.lock);
+ if (unlikely(stock_sock))
+ mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, stock_sock);
+
return ret;
}
+static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
+{
+ return __consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages, 0);
+}
+
static void memcg_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
{
page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
@@ -2201,6 +2226,7 @@ static void drain_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock, int i)
{
struct mem_cgroup *old = stock->cached[i];
uint8_t stock_pages;
+ int stock_sock;
if (!old)
return;
@@ -2211,6 +2237,12 @@ static void drain_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock, int i)
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], 0);
}
+ stock_sock = stock->nr_sock[i];
+ if (stock_sock) {
+ mod_memcg_state(old, MEMCG_SOCK, stock_sock);
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i], 0);
+ }
+
WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached[i], NULL);
css_put(&old->css);
}
@@ -2255,12 +2287,15 @@ static void drain_local_obj_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
local_unlock(&obj_stock.lock);
}
-static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
+static __always_inline void __refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned int nr_pages,
+ unsigned int nr_sock)
{
struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
struct mem_cgroup *cached;
unsigned int stock_pages;
int empty_slot = -1;
+ int stock_sock = 0;
int i;
/*
@@ -2274,13 +2309,15 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
if (unlikely(nr_pages > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH ||
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG_NMI_SAFETY_REQUIRES_ATOMIC) &&
+ in_nmi()) ||
!local_trylock(&memcg_stock.lock))) {
/*
* In case of larger than batch refill or unlikely failure to
* lock the percpu memcg_stock.lock, uncharge memcg directly.
*/
memcg_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages);
- return;
+ goto update_sock;
}
stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
@@ -2301,7 +2338,22 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], stock_pages);
+ if (nr_sock) {
+ stock_sock = stock->nr_sock[i] - nr_sock;
+
+ if (likely(stock_sock > -(int)MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i], stock_sock);
+ stock_sock = 0;
+ } else {
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i], 0);
+ }
+ }
+
local_unlock(&memcg_stock.lock);
+
+ if (unlikely(stock_sock))
+ mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, stock_sock);
+
return;
}
@@ -2318,6 +2370,15 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], nr_pages);
local_unlock(&memcg_stock.lock);
+
+update_sock:
+ if (nr_sock)
+ mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, -nr_sock);
+}
+
+static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
+{
+ __refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages, 0);
}
static bool is_memcg_drain_needed(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
@@ -2333,7 +2394,8 @@ static bool is_memcg_drain_needed(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
if (!memcg)
continue;
- if (READ_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i]) &&
+ if ((READ_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i]) ||
+ READ_ONCE(stock->nr_sock[i])) &&
mem_cgroup_is_descendant(memcg, root_memcg)) {
flush = true;
break;
@@ -5798,6 +5860,9 @@ bool mem_cgroup_sk_charge(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int nr_pages,
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
return memcg1_charge_skmem(memcg, nr_pages, gfp_mask);
+ if (likely(__consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages, nr_pages)))
+ return true;
+
if (try_charge_memcg(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages) == 0) {
mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, nr_pages);
return true;
@@ -5820,9 +5885,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_uncharge(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int nr_pages)
return;
}
- mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, -nr_pages);
-
- refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
+ __refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages, nr_pages);
}
void mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue(void)
--
2.56.0.313.g2479322e68-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 18:50 [PATCH v2 0/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] memcg: Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE() under memcg_stock.lock Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:48 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] memcg: Reduce nesting in consume_stock() and refill_stock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] memcg: Annotate slow paths " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:49 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] memcg: Uncharge pages outside memcg_stock.lock in __refill_stock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: cgroup: Deflake test_memcg_sock() in test_memcontrol.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 0:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:35 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 2:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028185034.3607746-5-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox