From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutn?" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -v4 02/22] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 19:41:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101114206.2434398-3-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101114206.2434398-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
partition_xcpus_del() only updates isolated_cpus when the partition that
gives back the CPUs has a different state than its parent. CPUs that were
further distributed to descendant isolated partitions are not taken into
account, so isolated_cpus_release() has to be called afterwards in
several places to walk up the ancestors and fix isolated_cpus.
Make partition_xcpus_del() always set the isolation state of the given
back CPUs to the state of the parent that receives them. As the
effective_xcpus of a partition covers the CPUs distributed to its
descendants, the isolation state of those CPUs is settled at the same
time. Boot-time isolated CPUs are still preserved by isolated_cpu_update().
compute_partition_effective_cpumask() invalidates a child partition
without going through partition_xcpus_del(), so do the same there: the
CPUs of the invalidated child take the isolation state of its parent.
isolated_cpus_release() is no longer needed and is removed.
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 86 ++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 72e1df1295e1..df9fc126e391 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1264,42 +1264,21 @@ static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus
}
/*
- * isolated_cpus_release - Remove the relevant CPUs in @xcpus from isolated_cpus
- * @cs: the current cpuset
- * @xcpus: the set of effective xcpus to be considered for removal
- *
- * This function is called when an isolated partition is invalidated or when
- * some of its effective xcpus are to be removed from isolated_cpus due to
- * changes in parent cpuset. The given @xcpus must be modifiable as the function
- * will update its value to determine the right set of CPUs to be removed.
+ * isolated_cpus_set_state - Set the isolation state of @xcpus
+ * @prs: partition root state that @xcpus will belong to
+ * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs whose isolation state may change
*/
-static void isolated_cpus_release(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus)
+static void isolated_cpus_set_state(int prs, struct cpumask *xcpus)
{
- struct cpuset *ancestor = parent_cs(cs);
- struct cpuset *iancestor = NULL;
-
- /*
- * Search the furthest isolated partition root ancestor available
- * until top_cpuset or a remote partition root is hit.
- */
- for (; ancestor; ancestor = parent_cs(ancestor)) {
- if (ancestor->partition_root_state == PRS_ISOLATED)
- iancestor = ancestor;
- if (is_remote_partition(ancestor))
- break;
- }
-
- /*
- * If a furthest isolated partition acnestor is found, use it to
- * determine which of the CPUs in @xcpus should be removed from
- * isolated_cpus. Otherwise, all of them will be removed.
- */
- if (iancestor && !cpumask_andnot(xcpus, xcpus, iancestor->effective_xcpus))
- return; /* No CPU should be removed from isolated_cpus */
+ bool updated = false;
+ int cpu;
- spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
- isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT, xcpus);
- spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, xcpus)
+ updated |= isolated_cpu_update(prs, cpu);
+ if (updated)
+ update_housekeeping = true;
}
/*
@@ -1355,9 +1334,12 @@ static void partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
if (parent == &top_cpuset)
cpumask_andnot(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
- if (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
- isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, parent->partition_root_state,
- xcpus);
+ /*
+ * CPUs given back to parent take the parent's isolation state. This
+ * also covers CPUs that were further distributed to descendant
+ * isolated partitions.
+ */
+ isolated_cpus_set_state(parent->partition_root_state, xcpus);
cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
cpumask_and(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
@@ -1640,14 +1622,13 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
/*
- * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
- * if necessary.
+ * Invalidate child partition. Its CPUs, including those
+ * further distributed to its descendants, take the
+ * isolation state of cs.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
- if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
- isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
- child->effective_xcpus);
+ isolated_cpus_set_state(parent_prs, child->effective_xcpus);
child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
@@ -2090,21 +2071,8 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
*
* A partition error happens when parent has tasks and all
* its effective CPUs will have to be distributed out.
- *
- * For an isolated partition with a shrunk root partition parent
- * we may need to return some or all of its isolated CPUs.
*/
nocpu |= cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask);
- if ((parent_prs == PRS_ROOT) && (old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED)) {
- cpumask_clear(tmp->addmask);
- if (nocpu)
- cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus);
- else if (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus))
- cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
- parent->effective_xcpus);
- if (!cpumask_empty(tmp->addmask))
- isolated_cpus_release(cs, tmp->addmask);
- }
if (nocpu) {
part_error = PERR_NOCPUS;
if (is_partition_valid(cs))
@@ -2327,18 +2295,12 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
/*
* When parent is not a valid partition root,
* child partition roots become invalid too.
- *
- * For a to be invalidated isolated partition,
- * call return_isolated_cpus() to remove the
- * relevant CPUs from isolated_cpus.
+ * The isolation state of their CPUs has been
+ * settled when the parent gave them back.
*/
if (is_partition_valid(cp))
new_prs = -old_prs;
- if (old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) {
- cpumask_copy(tmp->delmask, cp->effective_xcpus);
- isolated_cpus_release(cp, tmp->delmask);
- }
WRITE_ONCE(cp->prs_err,
is_partition_invalid(parent)
? PERR_INVPARENT : PERR_NOTPART);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 11:41 [RFC PATCH -v4 00/22] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 01/22] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 04/22] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 05/22] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 06/22] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 07/22] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 08/22] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 09/22] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 10/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 11/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 12/22] cpuset: use local_partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 13/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 14/22] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 15/22] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 16/22] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 17/22] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 18/22] cpuset: use validate_local_partition in local_partition_enable Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 19/22] cpuset: introduce validate_remote_partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 20/22] cpuset: simplify the update_prstate() function Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 21/22] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 22/22] cpuset: remove unnecessary validation in partition_cpus_change Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261101114206.2434398-3-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox