From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, lujialin4@huawei.com,
chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cpuset: Remove unnecessary checks in rebuild_sched_domains_locked
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:16:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27ed2c0b-7b00-4be0-a134-3c370cf85d8e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118083643.1363020-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
On 11/18/25 3:36 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> Commit 406100f3da08 ("cpuset: fix race between hotplug work and later CPU
> offline")added a check for empty effective_cpus in partitions for cgroup
> v2. However, thischeck did not account for remote partitions, which were
> introduced later.
>
> After commit 2125c0034c5d ("cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug processing
> synchronous"),cgroup v2's cpuset hotplug handling is now synchronous. This
> eliminates the race condition with subsequent CPU offline operations that
> the original check aimed to fix.
That is true. The original asynchronous cpuset_hotplug_workfn() is
called after the hotplug operation finishes. So cpuset can be in a state
where cpu_active_mask was updated, but not the effective cpumasks in
cpuset.
>
> Instead of extending the check to support remote partitions, this patch
> removes the redundant partition effective_cpus check. Additionally, it adds
> a check and warningto verify that all generated sched domains consist of
"warningto" => "warning to"
> active CPUs, preventing partition_sched_domains from being invoked with
> offline CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 29 ++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index daf813386260..1ac58e3f26b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1084,11 +1084,10 @@ void dl_rebuild_rd_accounting(void)
> */
> void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
> {
> - struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
> struct sched_domain_attr *attr;
> cpumask_var_t *doms;
> - struct cpuset *cs;
> int ndoms;
> + int i;
>
> lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
In fact, the following code and the comments above in
rebuild_sched_domains_locked() are also no longer relevant. So you may
remove them as well.
if (!top_cpuset.nr_subparts_cpus &&
!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
return;
> @@ -1107,30 +1106,14 @@ void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
> !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * With subpartition CPUs, however, the effective CPUs of a partition
> - * root should be only a subset of the active CPUs. Since a CPU in any
> - * partition root could be offlined, all must be checked.
> - */
> - if (!cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus)) {
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cs, pos_css, &top_cpuset) {
> - if (!is_partition_valid(cs)) {
> - pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
> - continue;
> - }
> - if (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_cpus,
> - cpu_active_mask)) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - }
> -
> /* Generate domain masks and attrs */
> ndoms = generate_sched_domains(&doms, &attr);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ndoms; ++i) {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(doms[i], cpu_active_mask)))
> + return;
> + }
> +
If it is not clear about the purpose of the WARN_ON_ONCE() call, we
should add a comment to explain that cpu_active_mask will not be out of
sync with cpuset's effective cpumasks. So the warning should not be
triggered.
Cheers,
Longman
> /* Have scheduler rebuild the domains */
> partition_sched_domains(ndoms, doms, attr);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 8:36 [PATCH -next] cpuset: Remove unnecessary checks in rebuild_sched_domains_locked Chen Ridong
2025-11-25 0:50 ` Chen Ridong
2025-11-25 18:16 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-11-26 1:01 ` Chen Ridong
2025-11-26 2:33 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-26 3:17 ` Chen Ridong
2025-11-26 3:26 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-26 3:34 ` Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27ed2c0b-7b00-4be0-a134-3c370cf85d8e@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox