Re: [PATCH v14 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup testing

["Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 07:57 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:39:53 -0500, Huang, Kai <kai.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> > > @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static int __init sgx_init(void)
> > >        if (!sgx_page_cache_init())
> > >            return -ENOMEM;
> > >  -    if (!sgx_page_reclaimer_init()) {
> > > +    if (!sgx_page_reclaimer_init() || !sgx_cgroup_init()) {
> > >            ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >            goto err_page_cache;
> > >        }
> > 
> > Does it make more sense to move the sgx_cgroup_init() to the  
> > sgx_drv_init()?  The SGX cgroup only works for the driver side anyway.  
> > In this case, if something went wrong in sgx_cgroup_init(), the  
> > sgx_vepc_init() could still have a chance to work.
> > 
> 
> vepc reclamation is not done by cgroup/ksgxd but try_charge() won't work  
> if user expecting cgroup to limit vepc allocation. 
> 

Oh ok.

> Would it be more  
> consistent to just disable vepc, i.e., on system with MISC, sgx/vepc  
> always go with cgroup enabled?
> 

Yes fine to me.
>