From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v5 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check()
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 21:51:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d5e7009-1427-489c-abcf-a1c05fee7e13@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602023203.248077-4-longman@redhat.com>
On 2026/6/2 10:32, Waiman Long wrote:
> Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() by including the setting
> of setsched flag inside cpuset_can_attach_check() with the new @oldcs
> and @psetsched argument. As cpuset_can_attach_check() is also called
> from cpuset_can_fork(), set the new arguments to NULL from that caller.
>
Hi Waiman,
The code change itself looks good to me. However, the commit message
has two paragraphs that don't match this patch:
> While at it, expose the source and destination cpuset cpu/memory check
> results in the new attach_cpus_updated and attach_mems_updated static
> flags so that these flags can be used directly from cpuset_attach()
> without the need to do the same computations again.
>
> Two new global attach related flags are added (attach_cpus_updated &
> attach_mems_updated) which are set to indicate that CPUs or memory nodes
> are updated. These 2 flags are set in cpuset_can_attach() and are used
> in cpuset_attach() for optimization. Since cpuset_mutex will be released
> between the 2 calls, it is possible that an intervening cpuset action
> may change the CPU or node mask of the relevant cpusets, so check is
> added to set these flags if the effective_cpus or effective_mems of
> those cpusets is changed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 5c1f3ee48d5d..5c777b1237a8 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2982,12 +2982,39 @@ static struct cpuset *cpuset_attach_old_cs;
> * For v1, cpus_allowed and mems_allowed can't be empty.
> * For v2, effective_cpus can't be empty.
> * Note that in v1, effective_cpus = cpus_allowed.
> + *
> + * Also set the boolean flag passed in by @psetsched depending on if
> + * security_task_setscheduler() call is needed and @oldcs is not NULL.
> */
> -static int cpuset_can_attach_check(struct cpuset *cs)
> +static int cpuset_can_attach_check(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *oldcs,
> + bool *psetsched)
> {
> if (cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus) ||
> (!is_in_v2_mode() && nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed)))
> return -ENOSPC;
> +
> + if (!oldcs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Skip rights over task setsched check in v2 when nothing changes,
> + * migration permission derives from hierarchy ownership in
> + * cgroup_procs_write_permission()).
> + */
> + *psetsched = !cpuset_v2() ||
> + !cpumask_equal(cs->effective_cpus, oldcs->effective_cpus) ||
> + !nodes_equal(cs->effective_mems, oldcs->effective_mems);
> +
> + /*
> + * A v1 cpuset with tasks will have no CPU left only when CPU hotplug
> + * brings the last online CPU offline as users are not allowed to empty
> + * cpuset.cpus when there are active tasks inside. When that happens,
> + * we should allow tasks to migrate out without security check to make
> + * sure they will be able to run after migration.
> + */
> + if (!is_in_v2_mode() && cpumask_empty(oldcs->effective_cpus))
> + *psetsched = false;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3034,29 +3061,10 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
> mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
>
> /* Check to see if task is allowed in the cpuset */
> - ret = cpuset_can_attach_check(cs);
> + ret = cpuset_can_attach_check(cs, oldcs, &setsched_check);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - /*
> - * Skip rights over task setsched check in v2 when nothing changes,
> - * migration permission derives from hierarchy ownership in
> - * cgroup_procs_write_permission()).
> - */
> - setsched_check = !cpuset_v2() ||
> - !cpumask_equal(cs->effective_cpus, oldcs->effective_cpus) ||
> - !nodes_equal(cs->effective_mems, oldcs->effective_mems);
> -
> - /*
> - * A v1 cpuset with tasks will have no CPU left only when CPU hotplug
> - * brings the last online CPU offline as users are not allowed to empty
> - * cpuset.cpus when there are active tasks inside. When that happens,
> - * we should allow tasks to migrate out without security check to make
> - * sure they will be able to run after migration.
> - */
> - if (!is_in_v2_mode() && cpumask_empty(oldcs->effective_cpus))
> - setsched_check = false;
> -
> cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset) {
> ret = task_can_attach(task);
> if (ret)
> @@ -3601,7 +3609,7 @@ static int cpuset_can_fork(struct task_struct *task, struct css_set *cset)
> mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
>
> /* Check to see if task is allowed in the cpuset */
> - ret = cpuset_can_attach_check(cs);
> + ret = cpuset_can_attach_check(cs, NULL, NULL);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock;
>
--
Best regards,
Ridong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 2:31 [PATCH-next v5 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-02 2:31 ` [PATCH-next v5 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix node inconsistencies between cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and cpuset_attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-02 13:37 ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-02 18:43 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-02 2:31 ` [PATCH-next v5 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Add a cpuset_reserve_dl_bw() helper Waiman Long
2026-06-02 13:40 ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-02 2:32 ` [PATCH-next v5 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() Waiman Long
2026-06-02 13:51 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-06-02 2:32 ` [PATCH-next v5 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset_attach_old_cs track task group leaders Waiman Long
2026-06-02 13:58 ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-02 2:32 ` [PATCH-next v5 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Move mpol_rebind_mm/cpuset_migrate_mm() calls inside cpuset_attach_task() Waiman Long
2026-06-02 2:32 ` [PATCH-next v5 6/6] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-03 10:26 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets using pids pattern Ridong Chen
2026-06-03 10:32 ` Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d5e7009-1427-489c-abcf-a1c05fee7e13@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox