Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/cgroup: Fix intermittent test_cgfreezer_ptrace test failures
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:24:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e5102e4-0732-41c2-a5be-bbff2f386e58@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ae04b8055b7145e182380a46f92c26e@kernel.org>



在 2026/7/15 06:09, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Hello, Waiman.
> 
>> +	usleep(1000);
>>  	if (cg_check_frozen(cgroup, true))
>>  		goto cleanup;
> 
> A fixed 1ms sleep only hides the race. On a loaded machine or a slow arch
> (you mention ppc64) the refreeze can take longer than 1ms, and the test
> reads the unfrozen state and fails anyway.
> 
> The freezer test already has a way to wait for this properly.
> cg_prepare_for_wait() sets up an inotify watch on cgroup.events and
> cg_wait_for() blocks until it changes. cg_enter_and_wait_for_frozen() shows
> the pattern: loop cg_wait_for() then cg_check_frozen(). The cgroup always
> ends up frozen, so looping until cg_check_frozen() reports frozen is
> reliable and doesn't depend on timing.
> 
> Can you respin using that instead of usleep()?
> 
> Also, temporaily -> temporarily, in both the changelog and the comment.
> 

Hi Tejun, Waiman,

I ran into a similar issue a while back and can add a data point on
the reproducibility: when running the full cgroup selftest suite, a
few cases -- test_cgfreezer_ptrace and test_cgfreezer_stopped -- fail
intermittently (around 40-70% on VMs), yet each failing case passes
reliably when run on its own. That points at state carried across
tests rather than a per-test bug, which is also why a fixed sleep/retry
is fragile.

On the "unfrozen state" above, I traced where CGRP_FROZEN actually gets
cleared. When the frozen tracee is woken by PTRACE_INTERRUPT,
JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP takes priority over JOBCTL_TRAP_FREEZE in get_signal(),
so the task enters ptrace_stop() instead of going back to
do_freezer_trap(). With debug printk in cgroup_update_frozen_flag() and
cgroup_leave_frozen(), the cg_test_ptrace trace shows:

  0 -> 1  nr_frozen=1  task_count=1   /* initial freeze            */
  1 -> 0  nr_frozen=0  task_count=1   /* dec, task still in cgroup */
  0 -> 1  nr_frozen=0  task_count=0   /* task left cgroup          */

The 1 -> 0 step (nr_frozen 1->0 while task_count is still 1) is
cgroup_dec_frozen_cnt(), called from cgroup_leave_frozen(true) at the
end of ptrace_stop() (signal.c:2479) when the tracee is woken by
PTRACE_DETACH. That clears CGRP_FROZEN until the task loops back into
do_freezer_trap() and re-enters the frozen state -- the transient
unfrozen window the test hits.

As a kernel-side attempt I changed cgroup_enter_frozen() so it no longer
returns early when current->frozen is already true: css_set_lock is
taken before the check and, if CGRP_FREEZE is still set,
cgroup_update_frozen() is called to re-verify the cgroup frozen state
when a frozen task is handed off to ptrace.

Due to other work I've had to pause this investigation for now, so I'm
sharing the above as a data point rather than a finished fix.

Thanks,
Tao

> Thanks.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 18:31 [PATCH] selftests/cgroup: Fix intermittent test_cgfreezer_ptrace test failures Waiman Long
2026-07-14 22:09 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-15  1:24   ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-07-15  4:17     ` Waiman Long
2026-07-15  1:25   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e5102e4-0732-41c2-a5be-bbff2f386e58@linux.dev \
    --to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox