From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FE737E5E7; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787933638; cv=none; b=kzrMkdrWrue95RC4rM6UKZkUuwP3KXXGdxbOf8OpcbIgmLjkstGe57zQWWvQ0Mzy/en8d3f9e2DzzgNXysxikMhN257flSgWUYx9eofZnH62ck4l3uO30/ayNnkzpDAmzZvEe+jEoY7VSfjlbtOrhTAaARMKRu+tisnkBQPA9V4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787933638; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IFcfwBysJINcxMfSNDFyM7b2wk60J46XwABn1gllY0o=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Lm2I9RC+2igAaL+XHGQCLM0K2iA/U0JXkyIL6WzQk6OSjuZUJhfTNjAByY19uxTcqwgeMe+H6o3E0X5Ckv4R8p3Xsxe+mnV7wuKRbyz3cjnFDT57PyBwNLP/mQn5s6WBNJysEsS9Lk9mdS4NVqsGbd5KKe7WqXlsqeOp+uNMUA8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=surriel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b=D7QqSmOb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b="D7QqSmOb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surriel.com ; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References: In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID; bh=2TOHanlDmqs1MCHJU5mQ5YIvRXJl2lupzJtXXmLOVuc=; b=D7QqSm Ob0+hY6lYjhI0Mzw0AH2csJnCE+N3S4MXGbqzhQ59iETcGH/paxg1sekw1Ygx1ZKzTXEhTRgQGH74 2+Hjj+2rJ31B4kZ6geCR5VjVJ1ECb5Y4zN2O61xgAyM1pECogqFvNTczfLyeY5zUhLzYI5xjGZDl+ rDEyeUw+8BQx91da9opjZX/b5GK0YyyTWRKNs6kmDjvgN0yc5KhvnFDayjmbz9rpytl+SpzPzmOFP KcZMn+JX2emjqoo9RBmWuAxjyi71NAC5WTDZ0daFU2aTGlu+Gifv053Xdb3qgbTPgih7rDEqpnvGi Nog8LJW6h20W4JwnPPoFtvH0VH1Q==; Received: from [2601:18c:8100:a0e0:5a47:caff:fe78:8708] by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.99.5) (envelope-from ) id 1wzzDA-0000000927k-3eII; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:13:48 +0000 Message-ID: <35008c3b1d00766116bc9b6768d42238099117b8.camel@surriel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid stuck FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE bit on isolated cpus From: Rik van Riel To: Shakeel Butt , Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:13:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Autocrypt: addr=riel@surriel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mQENBFIt3aUBCADCK0LicyCYyMa0E1lodCDUBf6G+6C5UXKG1jEYwQu49cc/gUBTTk33A eo2hjn4JinVaPF3zfZprnKMEGGv4dHvEOCPWiNhlz5RtqH3SKJllq2dpeMS9RqbMvDA36rlJIIo47 Z/nl6IA8MDhSqyqdnTY8z7LnQHqq16jAqwo7Ll9qALXz4yG1ZdSCmo80VPetBZZPw7WMjo+1hByv/ lvdFnLfiQ52tayuuC1r9x2qZ/SYWd2M4p/f5CLmvG9UcnkbYFsKWz8bwOBWKg1PQcaYHLx06sHGdY dIDaeVvkIfMFwAprSo5EFU+aes2VB2ZjugOTbkkW2aPSWTRsBhPHhV6dABEBAAG0HlJpayB2YW4gU mllbCA8cmllbEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokBHwQwAQIACQUCW5LcVgIdIAAKCRDOed6ShMTeg05SB/986o gEgdq4byrtaBQKFg5LWfd8e+h+QzLOg/T8mSS3dJzFXe5JBOfvYg7Bj47xXi9I5sM+I9Lu9+1XVb/ r2rGJrU1DwA09TnmyFtK76bgMF0sBEh1ECILYNQTEIemzNFwOWLZZlEhZFRJsZyX+mtEp/WQIygHV WjwuP69VJw+fPQvLOGn4j8W9QXuvhha7u1QJ7mYx4dLGHrZlHdwDsqpvWsW+3rsIqs1BBe5/Itz9o 6y9gLNtQzwmSDioV8KhF85VmYInslhv5tUtMEppfdTLyX4SUKh8ftNIVmH9mXyRCZclSoa6IMd635 Jq1Pj2/Lp64tOzSvN5Y9zaiCc5FucXtB9SaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAc3VycmllbC5jb20+iQE +BBMBAgAoBQJSLd2lAhsjBQkSzAMABgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDOed6ShMTe g4PpB/0ZivKYFt0LaB22ssWUrBoeNWCP1NY/lkq2QbPhR3agLB7ZXI97PF2z/5QD9Fuy/FD/jddPx KRTvFCtHcEzTOcFjBmf52uqgt3U40H9GM++0IM0yHusd9EzlaWsbp09vsAV2DwdqS69x9RPbvE/Ne fO5subhocH76okcF/aQiQ+oj2j6LJZGBJBVigOHg+4zyzdDgKM+jp0bvDI51KQ4XfxV593OhvkS3z 3FPx0CE7l62WhWrieHyBblqvkTYgJ6dq4bsYpqxxGJOkQ47WpEUx6onH+rImWmPJbSYGhwBzTo0Mm G1Nb1qGPG+mTrSmJjDRxrwf1zjmYqQreWVSFEt26tBpSaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAZmIuY29tP okBPgQTAQIAKAUCW5LbiAIbIwUJEswDAAYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQznneko TE3oOUEQgAsrGxjTC1bGtZyuvyQPcXclap11Ogib6rQywGYu6/Mnkbd6hbyY3wpdyQii/cas2S44N cQj8HkGv91JLVE24/Wt0gITPCH3rLVJJDGQxprHTVDs1t1RAbsbp0XTksZPCNWDGYIBo2aHDwErhI omYQ0Xluo1WBtH/UmHgirHvclsou1Ks9jyTxiPyUKRfae7GNOFiX99+ZlB27P3t8CjtSO831Ij0Ip QrfooZ21YVlUKw0Wy6Ll8EyefyrEYSh8KTm8dQj4O7xxvdg865TLeLpho5PwDRF+/mR3qi8CdGbkE c4pYZQO8UDXUN4S+pe0aTeTqlYw8rRHWF9TnvtpcNzZw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-1.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2026-08-28 at 08:41 -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: >=20 > Let's go with this patch. We can simplify above by inversing the > check: >=20 > if (cpu_is_isolated(cpu)) > return false; >=20 At that point, we could also clear the bit here, and have the function return void again, so there's no duplication of that check and clear in drain_all_stock() > =09 > queue_work_on(cpu, memcg_wq, &memcg_st->work); > return true; Let me send that. --=20 All Rights Reversed.