From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sha Zhengju Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: revise the position of threshold index while unregistering event Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:37:44 +0800 Message-ID: <4F587DE8.6090005@gmail.com> References: <1331035943-7456-1-git-send-email-handai.szj@taobao.com> <20120308144448.889337cf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4F58599A.3090100@gmail.com> <20120308163028.df8b6bde.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q8QjJPZKXd23ff6il98224K981gG1hh5QOrqmARodIg=; b=My4TBnEQqnN91wTIVu9Rf953Xaqh8mF3c8+6cQln2vtGncSIlGfuU8B/J5NVccxfMh EAD+XWq51nKg4pH5chlaHjOVsN8ZPNC9Cfiv2p7H+61vtbw9zc19L7C0o/DvirbZI9zU UDN9BuF/QNTFJ/jN5dCvZx6W/lzrqewFG5IkuVa066OmjhabdGpmcJomBhd5qijANrys a6dRcOJMezV5SIqYWDhgAJUfRlWt8IXxJzHymZi1DA3wfWhTaY0Jo9+XhaJfZZBF+uN7 fKQp5pXrlw+h5kCWJnfLXwHaqvtwRaJZhpjg5NEoxOuIRH5S1kqXy5TujeLF0+Cj9ky3 sO3g== In-Reply-To: <20120308163028.df8b6bde.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kirill-oKw7cIdHH8eLwutG50LtGA@public.gmane.org, Sha Zhengju On 03/08/2012 03:30 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:02:50 +0800 > Sha Zhengju wrote: > >> On 03/08/2012 01:44 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:12:23 +0800 >>> Sha Zhengju wrote: >>> >>>> From: Sha Zhengju >>>> >>>> Index current_threshold should point to threshold just below or equal to usage. >>>> See below: >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg00844.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju >>> Thank you for resending. >>> >>> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki >>> >> It's not a resending, though they are for the same reason. May be I should >> merge them together ... >> > Ah. Hmm..If your previous patch isn't picked up yet, could you send it again > (or merge and post merged one ) ? > > Thanks, > -Kame > Ok, I'll send a new version one later. :-) Thanks, Sha