From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:09:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F614138.10609@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWz4iyqyQD3g27J=wLvQ=WN0enXLB3rmHDAb51UJaLPJDz5BA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
(2012/03/15 1:17), Ying Han wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Just a quick question, could you please tell me what's the current
>> status of the development of per cgroup background reclaim? This topic
>> seems to be silent after Han Ying's patchset V7
>> (http://lwn.net/Articles/440073/) and Kame's async reclaim patchset V3
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/26/20), and I can't find it in
>> memcg-devel tree either.
>> Is anyone still working on this?
>
> There were some discussions on going w/ per-memcg kswapd thread or
> workqueue by that time. And now I think we agree to go w/ the
> per-memcg thread model.
I think agreed, too.
Thanks,
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 7:53 What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim? Zhu Yanhai
[not found] ` <CAC8teKW9Yry114+B06XiFbOtamwS6fNLzrKYo8PZazjEzMCiNQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-14 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-14 16:17 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4iyqyQD3g27J=wLvQ=WN0enXLB3rmHDAb51UJaLPJDz5BA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-15 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-03-15 3:12 ` Zhu Yanhai
[not found] ` <CAC8teKUrJ_ufkhtVAnsv-gzHfYmp8agY_bncOYS7mEdiqD+YZA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-15 16:31 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4iwO+eGFW23qVwjy=MKufRtiVck08pJphSij226pjTQiBw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 8:09 ` Zhu Yanhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F614138.10609@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu-+cum20s59erqfuhtdcdx3a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).