From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] don't force return value checking in res_counter_charge_nofail Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:28:31 +0900 Message-ID: <4F97533F.4070408@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1334959051-18203-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1334959051-18203-9-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1334959051-18203-9-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Glauber Costa Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Frederic Weisbecker , Greg Thelen , Suleiman Souhlal (2012/04/21 6:57), Glauber Costa wrote: > Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there > isn't the need to use __must_check with it. It can very well > be optional. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki > CC: Johannes Weiner > CC: Michal Hocko Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki