From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/23] kmem controller charge/uncharge infrastructure Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:44:22 -0300 Message-ID: <4F980DC6.9020000@parallels.com> References: <1334959051-18203-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1335138820-26590-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120424142232.GC8626@somewhere> <4F9759C0.1070805@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F9759C0.1070805@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , David Rientjes , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Greg Thelen , Suleiman Souhlal , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg > > About kmem, if we count task_struct, page tables, etc...which can be freed by > OOM-Killer i.e. it's allocated for 'process', should be aware of OOM problem. > Using mm->owner makes sense to me until someone finds a great idea to handle > OOM situation rather than task killing. > noted, will update. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org