From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/28] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed. Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 19:45:42 +0400 Message-ID: <4FC4EF26.30609@parallels.com> References: <1337951028-3427-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1337951028-3427-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Greg Thelen , Suleiman Souhlal , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, David Rientjes On 05/29/2012 06:20 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >>> * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back >>> * to regular pages anyway in case of failure. >>> */ >>> - if (nr_pages == 1&& ret) >>> + if (nr_pages<= (PAGE_SIZE<< PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)&& ret) { > > Should this not be > > nr_pages<= 1<< PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER I myself believe you are right. Not sure if Suleiman had anything in mind that we're not seeing when he wrote this code?