From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] measure exec_clock for rt sched entities Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:42:35 +0400 Message-ID: <4FC5F99B.2060109@parallels.com> References: <1338371317-5980-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1338371317-5980-2-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1338373759.26856.238.camel@twins> <4FC5F727.2040804@parallels.com> <1338374555.26856.243.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1338374555.26856.243.camel@twins> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Paul Turner , Tejun Heo , "Eric W. Biederman" , handai.szj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Andrew.Phillips-xheW4WVAX9Y@public.gmane.org, Serge Hallyn On 05/30/2012 02:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 14:32 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >>>> + for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) { >>>> + rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se); >>>> + schedstat_add(rt_rq, exec_clock, delta_exec); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled()) >>>> return; >>> >>> See, this just makes me sad.. you now have a double >>> for_each_sched_rt_entity() loop. >> >> The way I read the rt.c code, it it is called from enqueue_task_rt only >> once. > > Ah, what I meant was, right after that !rt_bandwidth_enabled() muck we > do another for_each_sched_rt_entity() walk. I guess I can fold it there...