From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/25] memcg: Always free struct memcg through schedule_work() Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:40:11 +0400 Message-ID: <4FE18C6B.1020503@parallels.com> References: <1340015298-14133-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1340015298-14133-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <4FDF1A0D.6080204@jp.fujitsu.com> <4FDF1AAE.4080209@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Cristoph Lameter , David Rientjes , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Suleiman Souhlal , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko On 06/20/2012 11:32 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> >Maybe Pekka can merge the current -mm with his tree? > I first want to have a stable base from Christoph's "common slab" series > before I am comfortable with going forward with the memcg parts. > > Feel free to push forward any preparational patches to the slab > allocators, though. > > Pekka Kame and others: If you are already comfortable with the general shape of the series, it would do me good to do the same with the memcg preparation patches, so we have less code to review and merge in the next window. They are: memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page. memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed. memcg: change defines to an enum Do you see any value in merging them now ?