From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] memcg: optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:45:44 +0900 Message-ID: <4FE92258.4040900@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1340613872-9581-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com> <4FE834D9.8070903@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120625104357.GB12148@kernel> <20120625110926.GJ19805@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120625110926.GJ19805-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Michal Hocko Cc: Wanpeng Li , Johannes Weiner , Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Mike Frysinger , Arun Sharma , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org (2012/06/25 20:09), Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 25-06-12 18:43:57, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:52:25PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: >>> (2012/06/25 17:44), Wanpeng Li wrote: >>>> From: Wanpeng Li >>>> >>>> Optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit to save cpu cycle. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li >>> >>> I can't understand the benefit of this patch to the real world... >>> >>> So, if you wrote the patch description as "clean up" rather than optimize, >>> ok, I'll agree. >> OK, I will change to "Cleanup". Thank you Kame. > > Does this really clean something up? > I just thought unused variable is trash even if it disappears after complie. Thanks, -Kame