From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:29:44 +0400 Message-ID: <4FE9D568.4050802@parallels.com> References: <1340633728-12785-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1340633728-12785-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120625161720.ae13ae90.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120625161720.ae13ae90.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Andrew Morton Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Frederic Weisbecker , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Lameter , devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , Pekka Enberg On 06/26/2012 03:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> + if (ret == -EINTR) { >> >+ nofail = true; >> >+ /* >> >+ * __mem_cgroup_try_charge() chose to bypass to root due >> >+ * to OOM kill or fatal signal. > Is "bypass" correct? Maybe "fall back"? > Heh, forgot this one, sorry =( __mem_cgroup_try_charge does "goto bypass", so I believe the term "bypass" is better to allow whoever is following this code to follow it.