From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: unify mem_control_xxx to memcg_xxx Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:00:20 +0400 Message-ID: <4FEACBA4.10202@parallels.com> References: <1340756175-3420-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com> <4FEAC7C6.7030601@parallels.com> <20120627085917.GA5683@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120627085917.GA5683-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Michal Hocko Cc: Wanpeng Li , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 06/27/2012 12:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 27-06-12 12:43:50, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 06/27/2012 04:16 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li >>> >>> Changelog: >>> >>> V2 -> V1: >>> >>> * replace memory_cgroup_xxx by memcg_xxx >>> >>> Unify memcg functions to memcg_xxx. >> >> >> This patch achieves nothing. >> You're changing a couple of function names. Andrew stated goal was >> to change *all* function names from mem_cgroup_xxx to memcg_xxx, not >> just one or two. > > No mass things now, please. > git grep mem_cgroup_ mm/ include/ | wc -l > 863 > > This will be real pain for merging. > It's either that, or I have my new functions named memcg_ and we live with the inconsistency. Point is, changing one function name as he did, achieves nothing.