From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:49:59 +0400 Message-ID: <4FEB0177.1070303@parallels.com> References: <1340725634-9017-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1340725634-9017-3-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120626180451.GP3869@google.com> <20120626220809.GA4653@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20120626221452.GA15811@google.com> <20120627125119.GE5683@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120627125119.GE5683-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Michal Hocko Cc: Tejun Heo , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton On 06/27/2012 04:51 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> > Just disallow clearing .use_hierarchy if it was mounted with the >> > option? > Dunno, mount option just doesn't feel right. We do not offer other > attributes to be set by them so it would be just confusing. Besides that > it would require an integration into existing tools like cgconfig which > is yet another pain just because of something that we never promissed to > keep a certain way. There are many people who don't work with mount&fs > cgroups directly but rather use libcgroup for that... myself included.