From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
tieren@fnnas.com, axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, song@kernel.org, kmo@daterainc.com,
satyat@google.com, ebiggers@google.com, neil@brown.name,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 07/15] md/raid1: convert to use bio_submit_split_bioset()
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 16:03:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c823b51-f623-9a65-6d38-cfa874857eb2@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b9b78cd-06aa-407d-a224-a5903752599f@kernel.org>
Hi,
在 2025/09/01 14:43, Damien Le Moal 写道:
> On 9/1/25 12:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>
>> Unify bio split code, and prepare to fix disordered split IO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1586,18 +1577,13 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> max_sectors = min_t(int, max_sectors,
>> BIO_MAX_VECS * (PAGE_SIZE >> 9));
>> if (max_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
>> - struct bio *split = bio_split(bio, max_sectors,
>> - GFP_NOIO, &conf->bio_split);
>> -
>> - if (IS_ERR(split)) {
>> - error = PTR_ERR(split);
>> + bio = bio_submit_split_bioset(bio, max_sectors,
>> + &conf->bio_split);
>> + if (!bio) {
>> + set_bit(R1BIO_Returned, &r1_bio->state);
>
> Before it was "set_bit(R1BIO_Uptodate, &r1_bio->state);" that was done. Now it
> is R1BIO_Returned that is set. The commit message does not mention this change
> at all. Is this a bug fix ? If yes, that should be in a pre patch before the
> conversion to using bio_submit_split_bioset().
There should be no functional changes, before the change we:
1) set bio->bi_status to split error value;
2) set R1BIO_Uptodate;
3) raid_end_bio_io() check R1BIO_Returned is not set, and call
call_bio_endio();
4) call_bio_endio() check R1BIO_Uptodate is already set, keep the
bio->bi_status that is by split error;
With this change:
1) bio_submit_split_bioset() already fail the bio will split error;
2) set R1BIO_Returned;
3) raid_end_bio_io() check R1BIO_Returned is set and do nothing with the
bio;
And the same with raid10 in patch 8,9;
Perhaps I'll emphasize there is no function changes and explain a bit.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
>> goto err_handle;
>> }
>>
>> - bio_chain(split, bio);
>> - trace_block_split(split, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>> - submit_bio_noacct(bio);
>> - bio = split;
>> r1_bio->master_bio = bio;
>> r1_bio->sectors = max_sectors;
>> }
>> @@ -1687,8 +1673,6 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(error);
>> - set_bit(R1BIO_Uptodate, &r1_bio->state);
>> raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
>> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 3:32 [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/15] block: cleanup bio_issue Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 6:22 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] block: add QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 0:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-04 2:44 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-04 5:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/15] md: fix mssing blktrace bio split events Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:53 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-04 0:58 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/15] blk-crypto: fix missing processing for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-03 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/15] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-02 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:57 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/15] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 8:03 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2025-09-03 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/15] md/raid10: add a new r10bio flag R10BIO_Returned Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/15] md/raid10: convert read/write to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/15] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/15] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-04 0:50 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/15] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/15] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 17:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 1:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:41 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:59 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Bart Van Assche
2025-09-02 1:50 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 8:04 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c823b51-f623-9a65-6d38-cfa874857eb2@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).