From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:45:05 +0400
Message-ID: <5049C221.4030003@parallels.com>
References: <20120904143552.GB15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461241.5010300@parallels.com> <20120904145414.GC15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461610.30305@parallels.com> <20120904162501.GE15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <504709D4.2010800@parallels.com> <20120905144942.GH5388@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com> <20120906120623.GE22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50489270.7060108@parallels.com> <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120906121842.GG22426-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <cgroups.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Ben Hutchings <ben-/+tVBieCtBitmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>, Paul Turner <pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Lennart Poettering <lennart-mdGvqq1h2p+GdvJs77BJ7Q@public.gmane.org>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers-tD+1rO4QERM@public.gmane.org>, Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>

On 09/06/2012 04:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Just so I understand it:
>> > 
>> > Michal clearly objected before folding his patch with my Kconfig patch.
>> > But is there still opposition to merge both?
> I do not find the config option very much useful but if others feel it
> really is I won't block it.
> 
Tejun, what is your take on this?