public inbox for cgroups@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sachin Kamat
	<sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Balbir Singh
	<bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of sock.h file
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:32:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5052EBAD.6060202@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914082741.GC28039-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>

On 09/14/2012 12:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-09-12 13:28:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Has this patch been accepted?
> 
> Not yet. I am waiting for Glauber to ack it.
> 

I am fine with the change, assuming you tested it, after you made the
change I requested.

>>
>> On 12 September 2012 18:39, Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed 12-09-12 14:56:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Wed 12-09-12 12:50:41, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> index 795e525..85ec9ff 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>>>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>>>>>          struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>>>>>          spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>          struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are changing this, why not test for both? This field will be
>>>>> useless with inet disabled. I usually don't like conditional in
>>>>> structures (note that the "kmem" res counter in my patchsets is not
>>>>> conditional to KMEM!!), but since the decision was made to make this one
>>>>> conditional, I think INET is a much better test. I am fine with both though.
>>>>
>>>>  You are right of course. Updated patch bellow:
>>>
>>> Bahh. And I managed to send a different patch than I tested...
>>> ---
>>> From 0617ff7114bdf424160a8f1533784c837d426ec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:38:42 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: clean up networking headers file inclusion
>>>
>>> Memory controller doesn't need anything from the networking stack unless
>>> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is selected.
>>> Now we are including net/sock.h and net/tcp_memcontrol.h unconditionally
>>> which is not necessary. Moreover struct mem_cgroup contains tcp_mem even
>>> if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not selected which is not necessary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c |    8 +++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 795e525..1a217b4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>         struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>         spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>         struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>  #endif
>>>  };
>>> @@ -413,8 +417,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
>>>
>>>  /* Writing them here to avoid exposing memcg's inner layout */
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>> -#include <net/sock.h>
>>> -#include <net/ip.h>
>>>
>>>  static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>>  void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michal Hocko
>>> SUSE Labs
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> With warm regards,
>> Sachin
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-14  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-11  8:08 [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of sock.h file Sachin Kamat
2012-09-11  9:52 ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <20120911095200.GB8058-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12  3:39     ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-12  7:25     ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]       ` <20120912072520.GB17516-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12  8:50         ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]           ` <50504CE1.8030509-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 12:56             ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]               ` <20120912125647.GH21579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 13:09                 ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                   ` <20120912130935.GJ21579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  7:58                     ` Sachin Kamat
     [not found]                       ` <CAK9yfHwMnC65BvY3RG7duf_Cmt5hf1VLV=vZRag4Mm6nHdQ-GA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  8:27                         ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                           ` <20120914082741.GC28039-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  8:32                             ` Glauber Costa [this message]
     [not found]                               ` <5052EBAD.6060202-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  9:56                                 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5052EBAD.6060202@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox