From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 0/2] 2 bug fixes for the 3.4 cgroup code Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:48:39 +0100 Message-ID: <50ED8347.7000806@redhat.com> References: <1357733486-1742-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20130109143850.GG3926@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130109143850.GG3926-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Tejun Heo Cc: Li Zefan , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hi, On 01/09/2013 03:38 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Hans. > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Allthough I know everyone dislikes looking back at old code once it has >> been rewritten in a better fashion, I hope you are still willing to make >> some time to review these 2 simple patches, as a first step in getting >> them into 3.4.xx. > > Well, the problem is that -stable doesn't take any patch which isn't > already upstream, I know that that is the generic rule, but I was hoping Greg KH would be willing to make an exception. At least I can try :) I've solved the panic btw, I'll send a v2 of the set right after this mail, including an explanation what was wrong with v1. I was hoping that I could get a review from you on v2 including an Acked-by (assuming the review does not find any issues) before I very kindly ask Greg KH to make an exception for this. Thanks & Regards, Hans