From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set. Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:18:25 +0900 Message-ID: <51071551.8040903@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1358862461-18046-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1358862461-18046-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1358862461-18046-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Glauber Costa Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner (2013/01/22 22:47), Glauber Costa wrote: > We were deferring the kmemcg static branch increment to a later time, > due to a nasty dependency between the cpu_hotplug lock, taken by the > jump label update, and the cgroup_lock. > > Now we no longer take the cgroup lock, and we can save ourselves the > trouble. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org