Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cgroup: make sure parent won't be destroyed before its children

Tejun Heo
2013-04-04T15:22:13Z

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:20:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > But what harm does an additional reference do?
>
> No harm at all. I just wanted to be sure that this is not yet another
> "for memcg" hack. So if this is useful for other controllers then I have
> no objections of course.

I think it makes sense in general, so let's do it in cgroup core. I
suppose it'd be easier for this to be routed together with other memcg
changes?

Thanks.

--
tejun