Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup

Michal Hocko
2013-04-07T19:51:12Z

On Sun 07-04-13 16:44:07, Li Zefan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm rebasing this patchset against latest linux-next, and it conflicts with
> "[PATCH v2] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs." slightly.
>
> That is a debugging patch and will never be pushed into mainline, so should I
> still base this patchset on that debugging patch?

Could you split CONFIG_MEMCG_DEBUG_ASYNC_DESTROY changes into a separate
patch so that Andrew could put it on top of the mentioned patch?

> Also that patch needs update (and can be simplified) after this patchset:
> - move memcg_dangling_add() to mem_cgroup_css_offline()
> - remove memcg->memcg_name, and use cgroup_path() in mem_cgroup_dangling_read()?

Every improvement is welcome.

Thanks
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs