Re: [PATCH 0/4] memcg: fix memcg resource limit overflow issues

Sha Zhengju
2013-07-31T09:28:37Z

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 2013/7/31 16:23, Sha Zhengju wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> This issue is first discussed in:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136574878704295&w=2
>>>
>>> Then a second version sent to:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136776855928310&w=2
>>>
>>> We contacted Sha a month ago, she seems have no time to deal with it
>>> recently, but we quite need this patch. So I modified and resent it.
>>
>>
>> No, I didn't receive any of YOUR message, only a engineer named Libo
>> Chen from Huawei connected me recently. I don't approve you to resent
>> them on behalf of me, and just before you send this you even don't
>> send me a mail. Besides, after a rough look, I do not see any
>> innovative ideas from yourself but just rework patches from my last
>> version.
>> So I'm strong against this patchset.
>
> Sorry if this troubles you.
> Libo Chen is my colleague, we work together, he sent an email to you on
> 25 June, to ask about this issue, you said you'll resent it soon, but it
> didn't happen until now :(, and he asked again the other day and you didn't
> reply.

No, I replied him. I told him I'm working on another patchset, and I
planned to sent this after that one, and then there's no responds from
him. I've no idea it's so urgent to you.

> I modified it and sent out.
>
> I think split patches, rewrite changelogs and tests, they all kind of work
> right?

Yes, it is. But you're doing on other people's work!

> to upstream ASAP.
>
> So you want me rewrite this patchset and SOB only you or you want resent this
> by yourself? I'm ok with both :)
>
>
>