From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] memcg: rename cgroup_event to mem_cgroup_event Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:42:00 +0800 Message-ID: <5216DA08.8040406@huawei.com> References: <1376582550-12548-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1376582550-12548-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1376582550-12548-12-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tejun Heo Cc: mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > /* > + * DO NOT USE IN NEW FILES. > + * > + * "cgroup.event_control" implementation. > + * > + * This is way over-engineered. It tries to support fully configureable s/configureable/configurable > + * events for each user. Such level of flexibility is completely > + * unnecessary especially in the light of the planned unified hierarchy. > + * > + * Please deprecate this and replace with something simpler if at all > + * possible. > + */ > + > +/*