cgroups.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if  effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:50:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5257C9DA.80609@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5257C9A1.1030404@huawei.com>

We're going to have separate user-configured masks and effective ones.

Eventually configured masks can only be changed by writing cpuset.cpus
and cpuset.mems, and they won't be restricted by parent cpuset. While
effective masks reflect cpu/memory hotplug and hierachical restriction,
and these are the real masks that apply to the tasks in the cpuset.

We calculate effective mask this way:
  - top cpuset's effective_mask == online_mask, otherwise
  - cpuset's effective_mask == configured_mask & parent effective_mask,
    if the result is empty, it inherits parent effective mask.

Those behavior changes are for sane_behavior only. For !sane_behavior
effective_mask and configured_mask are the same, so we won't break old
interfaces.

To make cs->effective_{cpus,mems} to be effective masks, we need to
  - change the effective masks at hotplug
  - change the effective masks at config change
  - take on ancestor's mask when the effective mask is empty

This won't introduce behavior change.

v2:
- Add comments to explain effective masks are the same with configured
masks for !sane_behavior.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index bdc6047..6723b88 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -899,16 +899,22 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
 		struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
 		struct cpumask *new_cpus = trialcs->effective_cpus;
 
-		cpumask_and(new_cpus, cp->cpus_allowed,
-			    parent->effective_cpus);
+		/*
+		 * If !sane_behavior, new_cpus will equals cpus_allowed,
+		 * which is not empty, so it's guaranteed the effective mask
+		 * is the same with the configured mask.
+		 */
+		cpumask_and(new_cpus, cp->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
 
 		/*
-		 * Skip the whole subtree if the cpumask remains the same
-		 * and isn't empty. If it's empty, we need to update tasks
-		 * to take on an ancestor's cpumask.
+		 * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
+		 * parent, which is guaranteed to have some CPUs.
 		 */
-		if (cpumask_equal(new_cpus, cp->effective_cpus) &&
-		    ((cp == cs) || !cpumask_empty(new_cpus))) {
+		if (cpumask_empty(new_cpus))
+			cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
+
+		/* Skip the whole subtree if the cpumask remains the same. */
+		if (cpumask_equal(new_cpus, cp->effective_cpus)) {
 			pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -1163,16 +1169,22 @@ static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
 		struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
 		nodemask_t *new_mems = &trialcs->effective_mems;
 
-		nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed,
-			  parent->effective_mems);
+		/*
+		 * If !sane_behavior, new_mems will equal mems_allowed,
+		 * which is not empty, so it's guaranteed the effective mask
+		 * is the same with the configured mask.
+		 */
+		nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
 
 		/*
-		 * Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same
-		 * and isn't empty. If it's empty, we need to update tasks
-		 * to take on an ancestor's nodemask.
+		 * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
+		 * parent, which is guaranteed to have some MEMs.
 		 */
-		if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems) &&
-		    ((cp == cs) || !nodes_empty(*new_mems))) {
+		if (nodes_empty(*new_mems))
+			*new_mems = parent->effective_mems;
+
+		/* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask is not changed. */
+		if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
 			pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -2203,7 +2215,11 @@ retry:
 
 	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
 	cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, &off_cpus);
+
+	/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty. */
 	cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, &off_cpus);
+	if (sane && cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus))
+		cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
 	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
 
 	/*
@@ -2218,7 +2234,11 @@ retry:
 
 	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
 	nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, off_mems);
+
+	/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty */
 	nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, off_mems);
+	if (sane && nodes_empty(cs->effective_mems))
+		cs->effective_mems = parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems;
 	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
 
 	/*
-- 
1.8.0.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-11  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-11  9:49 [PATCH v2 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Li Zefan
     [not found] ` <5257C9A1.1030404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-11  9:49   ` [PATCH v2 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Li Zefan
     [not found]   ` <5257C9CC.3080806-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-15 15:18     ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11  9:50 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-10-11  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Li Zefan
     [not found]   ` <5257C9EE.9080902-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-15 15:25     ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks Li Zefan
2013-10-11  9:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2013-10-15 15:36   ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5257C9DA.80609@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).