From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniel Wagner
<daniel.wagner-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>,
"peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org"
<peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org"
<raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org>,
"michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org"
<michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
"fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"vincent-9z8vmPu0pS/iB9QmIjCX8w@public.gmane.org"
<vincent-9z8vmPu0pS/iB9QmIjCX8w@public.gmane.org>,
"luca.abeni-3IIOeSMMxS4@public.gmane.org"
<luca.abeni-3IIOeSMMxS4@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/deadline: fix bandwidth check/update when migrating tasks between exclusive cpusets
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:46:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541C259E.4010207@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541C17D6.5020608-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 19/09/14 12:47, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/19/2014 11:22 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Exclusive cpusets are the only way users can restrict SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
>> affinity (performing what is commonly called clustered scheduling).
>> Unfortunately, such thing is currently broken for two reasons:
>>
>> - No check is performed when the user tries to attach a task to
>> an exlusive cpuset (recall that exclusive cpusets have an
>> associated maximum allowed bandwidth).
>>
>> - Bandwidths of source and destination cpusets are not correctly
>> updated after a task is migrated between them.
>>
>> This patch fixes both things at once, as they are opposite faces
>> of the same coin.
>>
>> The check is performed in cpuset_can_attach(), as there aren't any
>> points of failure after that function. The updated is split in two
>> halves. We first reserve bandwidth in the destination cpuset, after
>> we pass the check in cpuset_can_attach(). And we then release
>> bandwidth from the source cpuset when the task's affinity is
>> actually changed. Even if there can be time windows when sched_setattr()
>> may erroneously fail in the source cpuset, we are fine with it, as
>> we can't perfom an atomic update of both cpusets at once.
>>
>> Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Ack
>
> I have no special test for this, I just let my test running which was
> fixed by patch #1. Works fine though. I'll plan to write some test for this.
>
Ok, thanks. Just mind that the problem fixed by patch 3/3 may sometime
affect this too. I should have definitely put 3/3 on top of the patchset :/.
Thanks,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-19 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1411118561-26323-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
2014-09-19 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/deadline: fix bandwidth check/update when migrating tasks between exclusive cpusets Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 11:47 ` Daniel Wagner
[not found] ` <541C17D6.5020608-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-19 12:46 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
[not found] ` <1411118561-26323-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-19 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140919212547.GG2832-IIpfhp3q70wB9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-23 8:12 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-07 8:59 ` Juri Lelli
[not found] ` <5433AB8A.7050908-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-07 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20141007123109.GG19379-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-07 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-22 19:24 ` Vincent Legout
2014-09-23 8:09 ` Juri Lelli
[not found] ` <54212AB7.3070406-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-23 13:08 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541C259E.4010207@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luca.abeni-3IIOeSMMxS4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vincent-9z8vmPu0pS/iB9QmIjCX8w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox