From: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Zhigang.Luo@amd.com, arun.george@samsung.com,
brendan.jackman@linux.dev, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, alucerop@amd.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, djbw@kernel.org,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, osandov@osandov.com,
jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de, jackmanb@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
osalvador@suse.de, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
byungchul@sk.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, longman@redhat.com,
ridong.chen@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
sj@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
peterx@redhat.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
lance.yang@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/36] mm: refactor find_next_best_node to find_next_best_node_in
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:46:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62bf02dc-dab1-41bf-8204-eb3566628b93@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720193431.3841992-2-gourry@gourry.net>
On 7/21/26 5:33 AM, Gregory Price wrote:
> find_next_best_node() picks the next-closest node for a fallback list
> from the full N_MEMORY set. Refactor it into find_next_best_node_in(),
> which takes an explicit candidates nodemask.
>
> This enables building fallback lists with non-N_MEMORY candidates.
>
> No functional change: every caller still selects from N_MEMORY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> ---
> mm/internal.h | 6 ++++--
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 7 ++++---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index f26423de4ca28..96d78a7778e88 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -1103,7 +1103,8 @@ extern int node_reclaim_mode;
>
> extern unsigned long node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
> -extern int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask);
> +extern int find_next_best_node_in(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask,
> + const nodemask_t *candidates);
> #else
> #define node_reclaim_mode 0
>
> @@ -1112,7 +1113,8 @@ static inline unsigned long node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask)
> +static inline int find_next_best_node_in(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask,
> + const nodemask_t *candidates)
> {
> return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 54851d8a195b0..25e121851b586 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node, const nodemask_t *allowed_mask)
> * closest demotion target.
> */
> nodes_complement(mask, *allowed_mask);
> - return find_next_best_node(node, &mask);
> + return find_next_best_node_in(node, &mask, &node_states[N_MEMORY]);
> }
>
> static void disable_all_demotion_targets(void)
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
> memtier = list_next_entry(memtier, list);
> tier_nodes = get_memtier_nodemask(memtier);
> /*
> - * find_next_best_node, use 'used' nodemask as a skip list.
> + * find_next_best_node_in, use 'used' nodemask as a skip list.
> * Add all memory nodes except the selected memory tier
> * nodelist to skip list so that we find the best node from the
> * memtier nodelist.
> @@ -463,7 +463,8 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
> * in the preferred mask when allocating pages during demotion.
> */
> do {
> - target = find_next_best_node(node, &tier_nodes);
> + target = find_next_best_node_in(node, &tier_nodes,
> + &node_states[N_MEMORY]);
> if (target == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> break;
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f93a6bb9a872d..acf096f525f49 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5743,9 +5743,10 @@ static int numa_zonelist_order_handler(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> static int node_load[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> /**
> - * find_next_best_node - find the next node that should appear in a given node's fallback list
> + * find_next_best_node_in - find the next node that should appear in a given node's fallback list
> * @node: node whose fallback list we're appending
> * @used_node_mask: nodemask_t of already used nodes
> + * @candidates: nodemask_t of nodes eligible for selection
> *
> * We use a number of factors to determine which is the next node that should
> * appear on a given node's fallback list. The node should not have appeared
> @@ -5757,7 +5758,8 @@ static int node_load[MAX_NUMNODES];
> *
> * Return: node id of the found node or %NUMA_NO_NODE if no node is found.
> */
> -int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask)
> +int find_next_best_node_in(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask,
> + const nodemask_t *candidates)
> {
> int n, val;
> int min_val = INT_MAX;
> @@ -5767,12 +5769,12 @@ int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask)
> * Use the local node if we haven't already, but for memoryless local
> * node, we should skip it and fall back to other nodes.
> */
> - if (!node_isset(node, *used_node_mask) && node_state(node, N_MEMORY)) {
> + if (!node_isset(node, *used_node_mask) && node_isset(node, *candidates)) {
> node_set(node, *used_node_mask);
> return node;
> }
>
> - for_each_node_state(n, N_MEMORY) {
> + for_each_node_mask(n, *candidates) {
>
> /* Don't want a node to appear more than once */
> if (node_isset(n, *used_node_mask))
> @@ -5857,7 +5859,8 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> prev_node = local_node;
>
> memset(node_order, 0, sizeof(node_order));
> - while ((node = find_next_best_node(local_node, &used_mask)) >= 0) {
> + while ((node = find_next_best_node_in(local_node, &used_mask,
> + &node_states[N_MEMORY])) >= 0) {
> /*
> * We don't want to pressure a particular node.
> * So adding penalty to the first node in same
Looks good!
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 19:33 [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/36] mm: refactor find_next_best_node to find_next_best_node_in Gregory Price
2026-07-21 5:46 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/36] mm/page_alloc: refactor build_node_zonelist() out of build_zonelists() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/36] mm/page_alloc: let the bulk and folio allocators carry alloc_flags Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/36] numa: introduce N_MEMORY_PRIVATE Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/36] mm: add ZONELIST_PRIVATE(_NOFALLBACK) for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/36] cpuset: exclude private nodes from cpuset.mems (default-open) Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/36] mm/memory_hotplug: disallow migration-driven private node hotunplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/36] mm/mempolicy: skip private node folios when queueing for migration Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/36] mm/migrate: disallow userland driven migration for private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/36] mm/madvise: disallow madvise operations on private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 11/36] mm/compaction: disallow compaction on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 12/36] mm/page_alloc: clear private node watermarks and system reserves Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 13/36] mm/mempolicy: disallow NUMA Balancing prot_none on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 14/36] mm/damon: skip private node memory in DAMON migration and pageout Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 15/36] mm/ksm: skip KSM for managed-memory folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 16/36] mm/khugepaged: skip private node folios when trying to collapse Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 17/36] mm/vmscan: disallow reclaim of private node memory Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 18/36] mm/gup: disallow longterm pin of private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 19/36] proc: include N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes in numa_maps output Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 20/36] mm/memcontrol: account private-node memory in per-node stats Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 21/36] proc/kcore: include private-node RAM in the kcore RAM map Gregory Price
2026-07-20 20:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 22/36] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_F_PRIVATE and zonelist selection Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 23/36] mm/mempolicy: apply policy at the kernel zone for private-node binds Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 24/36] mm/mempolicy: add in-kernel MPOL_BIND interfaces for drivers/services Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 25/36] mm/memory_hotplug: support N_MEMORY_PRIVATE node hotplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 26/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM for opted-in private node reclaim Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 27/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_USER_NUMA for userland numa controls Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 28/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_HOTUNPLUG for opted-in private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 29/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_DEMOTION for private-node tiering demotion Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 30/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_NUMA_BALANCING for private-node NUMA balancing Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 31/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_LTPIN for private node folio pinning Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 32/36] mm/khugepaged: base private node collapse eligiblity on actor/cap bits Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 33/36] Documentation/mm: describe private (N_MEMORY_PRIVATE) memory nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 34/36] mm/mempolicy: add mpol_set_shared_policy_range() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 35/36] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node at creation Gregory Price
2026-07-21 3:46 ` [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Balbir Singh
2026-07-21 13:26 ` Zenghui Yu
2026-07-21 17:18 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62bf02dc-dab1-41bf-8204-eb3566628b93@nvidia.com \
--to=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=Zhigang.Luo@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox