From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFAA35E537 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 07:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768375320; cv=none; b=UPy1r3fPXkUuZSC8BvpTSrcP/eC8YxTP9qA8c+geTwAFCAIFEREO6shny6Wdp2ea5pCAzaOQwHssGuQiRyTRjgSOQW0TTwZMb9BIW4NMW7HgOgAR/hZgEpuXlJTsdQIurwLqqbpA7EPgu14nCDEQOKmCp9kSLwEaELw31PvsFcc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768375320; c=relaxed/simple; bh=erDNYbSTG1g3IsDfFXFlDnRa3gLj02cBtpsRCIAc4Ps=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mz0gEE462fafHo92oAsuy68mLjSWN/KcVvnSbzMbbE5/G9P4G8vcukTT/gWTKzA2fFfha7zo5UeYFN2+DCnsFD23CrjMzENlIR2zvTmp1Vng+P/kuI+X2JJ9XDa3PAnB96roPP1kY+sKwT4en0G2q9BFVWA+t2CeH5V9dQEFA2c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=qZ+rBRv0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="qZ+rBRv0" Message-ID: <70686841-393b-47e6-b859-c2c07c273569@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1768375310; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K0Y4zcNSVFbhgGtcesaqg9kuOlXT3wYJjn3Sc9JbeAs=; b=qZ+rBRv0vleQrxZd3mmQRXYExt58TgFeLWRUXsrpCfXmOURY+Q/lH+bKMnWiQPkNVpPtEx xWEJ8/R8calcY+rGpgCcrQ3nOkzCxcjqWslqQtG8Tp70Citz+0C0fX4q7ckS/5EolICodk KZ56oV0f3a6N09FjxCi35d6h71pASzM= Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:21:42 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Michal Hocko , hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, mkoutny@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com, apais@linux.microsoft.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng References: <7c47ff99-4626-46ec-b2f1-f236cdc4ced1@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Qi Zheng In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 1/14/26 2:02 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Hi Qi, > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 10:34:08AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> On 1/12/26 10:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> I can see that Johannes, Shakeel and others have done a review and also >>> suggested some minor improvements/modifications. Are you planning to >> >> Yes. I'm working on them (mainly non-hierarchical stats issue reported >> by Yosry Ahmed). >> >>> consolidate those and repost anytime soon? >> >> I'm testing it locally and will try to release v3 this week. > > Please take a look at the AI review posted by Roman. IMO it does have very > interesting comments, so at least go through them and check if those To be honest, until an official AI bot is developed, I don't want to see any raw AI comment results unless the sender has already reviewd them. > makes sense. Please point out if something doesn't make sense which we > help us to further improve the AI review process. That makes sense, the v3 fixed some issues, so let Roman scan it again with the AI bot based on v3. Thanks, Qi > > thanks, > Shakeel