From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-178.mta1.migadu.com (out-178.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91D82882C5 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767132227; cv=none; b=KQ26K+aC5QzCgx7PDHSNfdnzvzr2M6mWMhDg2mgz3BR2Davz+XgGn4jN77ixK1UL7i8q1q/hU+x7aNZS/m/djecVkAiEJ8HGeDGWU6uKoExWKg94K7VGj8wlQiTkKcOOL+hPLQKcUOpY+Xe8F46AmqtcJd0Sosst3bDnOA2b4Do= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767132227; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YZ8HSwXURoyKdtord6xQyU9G8lZDO6cM9ShKqBtjkJw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m1vEAgFXSeB3ceqUygwVGjyMIyg/Kiemf2z7JVnY/rq6D5u9pLHvh8B7AS7xG+rhj4j7uDY1Ewf69JoIVuCZxdFmA7VVqAtS/oi8+/9y2gn4oLBznyUOzLWzcnUcZLNm4n4/kq1xRAev/fgkpJn5Dd2H5hDEh3tBY0veLKKGucM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=s/zWljl2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="s/zWljl2" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1767132209; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NYw6PYyW0VlKW2REqOCLoq1sRa2/WhNEmjyXvfT6fN4=; b=s/zWljl2wXMXniaZyBwbMB8GBHWkU4sfoAwrP2HJEFJ+U1LakGQRmyb9UXbaY9TJNK7tXs ZVx3Qk8+pTdn2Mlz54fZkPsJPv1nTqxBZ0Vz1MKS1a0weNxoNBNVd/TzDEDO6EXaBw0tUa 8y3vGtXc5oO/g6DHH1lUPmSH2VC6DJs= From: Roman Gushchin To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Chris Mason , Shakeel Butt , Zi Yan , Qi Zheng , hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, mkoutny@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com, apais@linux.microsoft.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng , Chris Mason Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup In-Reply-To: (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2025 20:51:19 +0000") References: <7ia4ldikrbsj.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <1fe35038-abe1-4103-b5de-81e2b422bd21@linux.dev> <87tsx861o5.fsf@linux.dev> <03C3C4D4-DC37-4A2F-AFFA-AACC32BAEBEF@nvidia.com> <59098b4f-c3bf-4b6c-80fb-604e6e1c755e@meta.com> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:03:19 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4tsx7ocew.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Matthew Wilcox writes: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 02:18:51PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >> >>>> I just think you should do a preliminary review of the AI =E2=80=8B= =E2=80=8Breview results >> >>>> instead of sending them out directly. Otherwise, if everyone does t= his, >> >>>> the community will be full of bots. >>=20 >> I do think it's awkward to dump the whole review output for the patch >> series in a single message. It looks like there's a sudden jump to >> XML? >> It's better to reply to the individual patches with the comments >> inline, which I think is where Roman is trying to go long term. > > I don't know what Roman's trying to do long-term, but his email > that started this thread was so badly written that it was offensive. > Had it been sent to me, I would have responded in the style of Arkell > v Pressdram. It felt awkward to send a bunch of emails from myself, all beginning with the "I ran the ai review and here is the output" header. Once we have a bot, obviously it's better to answer individual emails, as the bpf subsystem does.