From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
song@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
tieren@fnnas.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset()
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 09:41:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <858e0210-1bbb-466b-98c3-d1a3c834519d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828065733.556341-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/28/25 15:57, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> On the one hand unify bio split code, prepare to fix disordered split
> IO; On the other hand fix missing blkcg_bio_issue_init() and
> trace_block_split() for split IO.
Hmmm... Shouldn't that be a prep patch with a fixes tag for backport ?
Because that "fix" here is not done directly but is the result of calling
bio_submit_split_bioset().
>
> Noted commit 319ff40a5427 ("md/raid0: Fix performance regression for large
> sequential writes") already fix disordered split IO by converting bio to
> underlying disks before submit_bio_noacct(), with the respect
> md_submit_bio() already split by sectors, and raid0_make_request() will
> split at most once for unaligned IO. This is a bit hacky and we'll convert
> this to solution in general later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid0.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
> index f1d8811a542a..4dcc5133d679 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
> @@ -463,21 +463,16 @@ static void raid0_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
> zone = find_zone(conf, &start);
>
> if (bio_end_sector(bio) > zone->zone_end) {
> - struct bio *split = bio_split(bio,
> - zone->zone_end - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, GFP_NOIO,
> - &mddev->bio_set);
> -
> - if (IS_ERR(split)) {
> - bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(PTR_ERR(split));
> - bio_endio(bio);
> + bio = bio_submit_split_bioset(bio,
> + zone->zone_end - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
Can this ever be negative (of course not I think)? But if
bio_submit_split_bioset() is changed to have an unsigned int sectors count,
maybe add a sanity check before calling bio_submit_split_bioset() ?
> + &mddev->bio_set);
> + if (!bio)
> return;
> - }
> - bio_chain(split, bio);
> - submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> - bio = split;
> +
> end = zone->zone_end;
> - } else
> + } else {
> end = bio_end_sector(bio);
> + }
>
> orig_end = end;
> if (zone != conf->strip_zone)
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-30 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 6:57 [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:03 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:41 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-08-30 4:10 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 4:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/10] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/10] md/raid10: convert read/write " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:18 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/10] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/10] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/10] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:55 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/10] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:22 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 1:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:28 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 2:40 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=858e0210-1bbb-466b-98c3-d1a3c834519d@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).