From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 03/11] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:20:39 -0800 Message-ID: <877g866i3c.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: (David Rientjes's message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:59:16 -0800 (PST)") Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Tejun Heo , Mel Gorman , Oleg Nesterov , Rik van Riel , Jianguo Wu , Tim Hockin , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org David Rientjes writes: > > Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up > whenever possible and make them available. We'll be using it shortly for > memcg oom reserves. I'm not convinced TCP_RR is a meaningfull benchmark for slab. The shortness seems like an artificial problem. Just add another flag word to the task_struct? That would seem to be the obvious way. People will need it sooner or later anyways. -Andi -- ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org -- Speaking for myself only