From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Muchun Song Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: remove definition of MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX when !CONFIG_MEMCG Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 09:47:46 +0800 Message-ID: <892B507C-CFE8-4792-BA5F-3C698290A8EE@linux.dev> References: <20230706112820.2393447-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1688694503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pp8ftPIqIMWudMuh7pf3FOr9N5RY8pAcKRI4zNvC1xk=; b=NAnGKJVhSLp4yv2kkSMp6ADs5X+O14sYJ3GsIbaqOhhGuEqWS8qfljYCRlUZlp9ICcdIYz 5FxxKOSECYnAUDSrDCflNCisXuLUqXM51woWVHg9ky1pusXt5nfstpC1xnpzNla/MRsAEM pVfOzYEieXPnM9NljXB2CjqfStTa/c0= In-Reply-To: <20230706112820.2393447-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Miaohe Lin Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linux Memory Management List > On Jul 6, 2023, at 19:28, Miaohe Lin wrote: > > MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX is only used when CONFIG_MEMCG is configured. Remove > unneeded !CONFIG_MEMCG variant. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX is also only used in mem_cgroup_alloc(), maybe you also could move it from memcontrol.h to memcontrol.c. And define it as: #define MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX ((1U << MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT) - 1) I am not suggesting defining it as USHRT_MAX, because if someone changes MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT in the future, then MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX will not updated accordingly. For this patch, LGTM. Reviewed-by: Muchun Song Thanks.