From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, llong@redhat.com, klarasmodin@gmail.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, yosryahmed@google.com, mkoutny@suse.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linus/master] cgroup: adjust criteria for rstat subsystem cpu lock access
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:53:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9eca911e-67f1-46b1-b5a6-df36b1758f60@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528235130.200966-1-inwardvessel@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 04:51:30PM -0700, JP Kobryn wrote:
> Previously it was found that on uniprocessor machines the size of
> raw_spinlock_t could be zero so a pre-processor conditional was used to
> avoid the allocation of ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock. The conditional did not take
> into account cases where lock debugging features were enabled. Cover these
> cases along with the original non-smp case by explicitly using the size of
> size of the lock type as criteria for allocation/access where applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 748922dcfabd "cgroup: use subsystem-specific rstat locks to avoid contention"
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202505281034.7ae1668d-lkp@intel.com
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> index ce4752ab9e09..cbeaa499a96a 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,20 @@ static spinlock_t *ss_rstat_lock(struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
>
> static raw_spinlock_t *ss_rstat_cpu_lock(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, int cpu)
> {
> - if (ss)
> + if (ss) {
> + /*
> + * Depending on config, the subsystem per-cpu lock type may be an
> + * empty struct. In enviromnents where this is the case, allocation
> + * of this field is not performed in ss_rstat_init(). Avoid a
> + * cpu-based offset relative to NULL by returning early. When the
> + * lock type is zero in size, the corresponding lock functions are
> + * no-ops so passing them NULL is acceptable.
> + */
> + if (sizeof(*ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock) == 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> return per_cpu_ptr(ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock, cpu);
> + }
>
> return per_cpu_ptr(&rstat_base_cpu_lock, cpu);
> }
> @@ -510,20 +522,15 @@ int __init ss_rstat_init(struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> - * On uniprocessor machines, arch_spinlock_t is defined as an empty
> - * struct. Avoid allocating a size of zero by having this block
> - * excluded in this case. It's acceptable to leave the subsystem locks
> - * unitialized since the associated lock functions are no-ops in the
> - * non-smp case.
> + * Depending on config, the subsystem per-cpu lock type may be an empty
> + * struct. Avoid allocating a size of zero in this case.
> */
> - if (ss) {
> + if (ss && sizeof(*ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock)) {
> ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock = alloc_percpu(raw_spinlock_t);
> if (!ss->rstat_ss_cpu_lock)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> -#endif
>
> spin_lock_init(ss_rstat_lock(ss));
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> --
> 2.47.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-03 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 23:51 [PATCH linus/master] cgroup: adjust criteria for rstat subsystem cpu lock access JP Kobryn
2025-05-29 0:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-29 5:23 ` Waiman Long
2025-05-29 15:14 ` JP Kobryn
2025-05-29 16:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-05-30 9:58 ` Michal Koutný
2025-05-31 0:07 ` JP Kobryn
2025-05-31 0:39 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-31 0:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-03 5:53 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9eca911e-67f1-46b1-b5a6-df36b1758f60@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=klarasmodin@gmail.com \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).