From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88CC5372E6 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790119859; cv=none; b=R2c8oGnQnmqefvrqloqX6OWpBdn8yxLN7o50J/HXG1wWflVnt5MD072igvrAdul4W0XXbMHna8HRWuUl32i/dwR5zvImhg6M3r0K2EAB0pifZqZsQO6xPkTXmVavcPJg07w4D0p8sQ72cHUUoOx/esi4xFU1Qooolj45F8DJT2M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790119859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IGAKDJgi2dJx6WJK/BkSLxg7707mBJgxdKRPlFR4c3U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fQ/XQV736csneEO3cFPavUS7PfDQcricywIkHdIXfxGSm5SqYQegccXew3VL985xf8Zvu8DSV8kbxBGUfeMEu8uWQ+Mf97qqxeHhLOGxDoRT1LA+bZXz1+DsscQj4zA4Rt0oC6IxQdDbAG19Jms8I8z+M4Z4bIvdl+VsZOq13A8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=CKJGQg7+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CKJGQg7+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1790119857; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q5+YBN+Xt2oI+X9FvnLri1OubT6BbtyJ9+8TD+cFyTU=; b=CKJGQg7+HzktRZMgfiGphKnDLptpOCsWMKfSHQfcVvTyd97UHZJ6Ya/OQk15uG5TU20k6i UVz1sZmaCt3syAXyMCi//gc2MdxrhfAPqMa2PX8QN7dnBSZntTUMTwLdd5S30MtRBmCfqi cZc94s3G62Lf05FBW8/5ZoOZdgo4/iw= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-311-o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw-1; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:30:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw_1790119851 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7836E1955F24; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.91.18.181] (headnet04.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.116]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4811956095; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9fadb6a1-df92-4c8f-96f3-f5fdf43e68d4@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:30:46 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Correct cpuset CPU descriptions To: Guopeng Zhang , Ridong Chen Cc: Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guopeng Zhang References: <20260922092034.68840-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: <20260922092034.68840-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On 9/22/26 5:20 AM, Guopeng Zhang wrote: > From: Guopeng Zhang > > The cpuset interface documentation says cpuset.cpus.isolated is empty > unless an isolated partition exists, omitting CPUs isolated at boot with > isolcpus=domain. Its cpuset.cpus.effective description also assumes CPUs > come from the immediate parent and are normally a subset of > cpuset.cpus, which is not always true for valid non-root partition roots. > > Update both descriptions to match the existing behavior. > > Changes since v2: > - Update the valid partition root example to show that an offline CPU > can remain in cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective while being excluded > from cpuset.cpus.effective. > - Add the Reviewed-by tag to patch 2. > - Patch 1 is unchanged. > > Guopeng Zhang (2): > docs: cgroup-v2: Describe boot-isolated CPUs in cpuset.cpus.isolated > docs: cgroup-v2: Describe effective CPUs of partition roots > > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) For the patch series, Reviewed-by: Waiman Long